Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rodin 2f8d047ef2 feat: load personas from target repo .review-bot/personas/
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 8m12s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 8m15s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Failing after 42s
Adds support for repository-specific personas. When --persona is
specified, review-bot now:

1. Checks the target repo's .review-bot/personas/<name>.yaml directory
2. Falls back to built-in persona if not found in repo

This allows repos to define domain-specific personas (trading, regulatory,
etc.) or override built-in personas with project-specific rules, without
requiring changes to CI configuration.

Implementation:
- New review.PersonaFetcher interface for abstracting Gitea API access
- review.LoadRemotePersonas() with graceful fallback on 404
- review.MergePersonas() for combining remote and built-in personas
- giteaFetcher adapter in main.go to bridge gitea.Client

The feature follows a partial-success model: invalid YAML files or
network errors for individual persona files are logged and skipped,
allowing other valid personas to load.

Closes #60
2026-05-10 19:05:55 -07:00
Rodin c3e8f0f231 fix: address PR review findings
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 9m32s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 9m53s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 10m52s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 11m0s
MAJOR fixes:
- Remove false security claim about gopkg.in/yaml.v3 having built-in depth protection
- Add explicit YAML depth limiting via yaml.Node API (MaxYAMLDepth=20)
- Add file size limit for persona files (MaxPersonaFileSize=64KB)
- Add test for deeply nested YAML rejection

MINOR fixes:
- Add sort.Strings to ListBuiltinPersonas for deterministic ordering
- Update design doc to reflect actual library used (gopkg.in/yaml.v3)
- Update README: 'Zero dependencies' → 'Minimal dependencies'
- Add test for file size limit
- Add test for sorted persona list
2026-05-10 14:43:31 -07:00
Rodin 7898dd939f feat: add YAML support for persona files (#57)
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 9m33s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 9m55s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 10m32s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 11m0s
- Add gopkg.in/yaml.v3 dependency (approved in CONVENTIONS.md)
- Update parsePersona to detect format by file extension
- Support both .yaml and .yml extensions (case-insensitive)
- Convert built-in personas to YAML format
- Add comprehensive tests for YAML parsing
- Update README with YAML examples and documentation

YAML provides cleaner multi-line strings via literal block scalars
and supports comments, making persona definitions more readable.
JSON remains supported for backwards compatibility.

Closes #57
2026-05-10 14:16:41 -07:00
Rodin 7dab35de41 feat: native SAP AI Core support
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 35s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 2m0s
Add native SAP AI Core provider that handles OAuth token management and
deployment discovery automatically. This eliminates the need for the
external LLM proxy when running in SAP environments.

Changes:
- Add AICoreClient with OAuth token caching and deployment URL discovery
- Support both Anthropic and OpenAI models via AI Core deployments
- Update CI to use native AI Core provider
- Update action inputs to accept AI Core credentials
- Update README with AI Core configuration examples

Model names must match AI Core deployment names (e.g. anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, gpt-5).
2026-05-10 10:25:10 -07:00
Rodin 4dd67742f9 fix: address review feedback on persona feature
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / review (/anthropic/v1, anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, anthropic, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, gpt, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, security, openai, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
MAJOR fixes:
- Remove external YAML dependency (github.com/goccy/go-yaml)
  Per project convention: Go standard library only, zero dependencies.
  Convert all persona files from YAML to JSON format.
- Fix TestValidateWorkspacePath error expectation
  Go 1.21+ filepath.Join normalizes absolute paths differently.

MINOR fixes:
- Remove custom contains helper in persona_test.go (use strings.Contains)
- Add Unicode-safe CapitalizeFirst function for header titles
- ListBuiltinPersonas returns empty slice instead of nil on error
- Fix test comment about filepath.Join behavior

Documentation:
- Update README to reflect JSON-only persona format
- Update design doc with note about JSON decision
- Fix action.yml description for persona-file input
2026-05-10 10:01:34 -07:00
Rodin 57e62a345f feat(persona): add role-based review personas
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 9m31s
CI / review (/anthropic/v1, anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, anthropic, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 10m3s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, gpt, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 11m30s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, security, openai, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 10m56s
Add persona system for specialized review roles. Each persona defines:
- A specific review focus (security, architecture, documentation)
- Custom system prompt additions
- Personality/tone adjustments

Built-in personas: security, architect, docs
Custom personas: load from JSON via persona-file flag

Includes workspace validation to prevent path traversal attacks.

Closes #51
2026-05-10 09:14:48 -07:00
Rodin 6c46220a53 docs: document runner requirements for composite action
CI / test (push) Successful in 14s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
Add a Runner Requirements section to the README documenting that
the composite action needs python3, sha256sum, and curl on the
runner. All are pre-installed on ubuntu-* runners but custom
images need to provide them.

Closes #12
2026-05-02 10:21:53 -07:00
Rodin 687005d982 feat: worst-wins reconciliation for shared-token review types
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
When multiple review types share a Gitea bot account, Gitea uses the
latest review to determine the user's approval state. This creates a
race: if security finds issues but code-quality finishes last with
APPROVE, the PR appears approved.

Now before posting, each job checks if any sibling review from the same
user has REQUEST_CHANGES. If so and we would post APPROVE, we downgrade
to COMMENT instead — the review is still visible but won't override
the blocking state.

Documented in README under "Shared Token: Worst-Wins."
2026-05-01 21:12:34 -07:00
Rodin 6a3c813279 fix: address review findings (path restriction, login cross-check, README)
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s
- system-prompt-file: reject absolute paths and paths containing ".."
  Prevents reading arbitrary files outside the workspace on shared runners.
- Cleanup: cross-check r.User.Login == posted.User.Login before deletion
  Defense-in-depth: only attempt to delete reviews from same author.
  Flagged by both sonnet and security reviewers.
- README: fix wording (cleanup happens after posting, not before)

Issues filed for deferred work:
- #24: Consistent url.PathEscape across all client endpoints
- #25: Binary signature verification for supply-chain hardening
2026-05-01 21:05:18 -07:00
Rodin b8af8306a6 docs: comprehensive README with action usage, cleanup behavior, custom prompts
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
- Quick start example with composite action + matrix strategy
- Full action inputs table with descriptions
- How sentinel-based cleanup works (explains the reviewer-name concept)
- Custom prompt file usage with security review example
- CLI usage with all flags
- Environment variables table
- Token scopes documentation
- Setup guide for new repos
2026-05-01 20:59:34 -07:00
Rodin 3c536c42d5 Add unit tests, integration test, CI workflow, and conventions
CI / test (push) Successful in 18s
CI / review (push) Has been skipped
- gitea/client_test.go: mock HTTP tests for all API methods + error cases
- llm/client_test.go: mock tests for completion, errors, timeouts
- review/parser_test.go: JSON parsing, markdown fences, validation
- review/formatter_test.go: markdown output, empty/multiple findings
- review/prompt_test.go: system/user prompt construction
- integration_test.go: full end-to-end flow (build tag: integration)
- .gitea/workflows/ci.yml: test + vet + build on push, dual LLM review on PRs
- CONVENTIONS.md: coding standards for self-review dogfooding
- README.md: usage docs, env vars, architecture
2026-05-01 10:03:44 -07:00
Rodin 700f186023 Initial implementation: AI code review bot for Gitea
- CLI binary with flag/env var configuration
- Gitea API client (PR metadata, diff, CI status, post review)
- OpenAI-compatible LLM client
- Structured review prompt with conventions support
- JSON response parser with validation
- Markdown review formatter for Gitea
- CI failure auto-detection (REQUEST_CHANGES)
- Dry-run mode for testing
2026-05-01 09:42:45 -07:00