Rodin
d7d5151a1f
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-4.1, gpt41, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Failing after 17s
CI / review (/anthropic/v1, claude-sonnet-4-6, sonnet, anthropic, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Failing after 17s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-4.1-mini, gpt41-mini, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Failing after 16s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5-mini, gpt5-mini, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Failing after 14s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, security, openai, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m28s
CI / review (/openai/v1, gpt-5, gpt, openai, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
Implement role-based review personas that provide specialized review focus: - Security: vulnerabilities, auth, secrets, injection attacks - Architect: design patterns, code organization, API contracts - Docs: documentation quality, API clarity, error messages Changes: - Add persona loading from JSON files and embedded built-ins - Add --persona and --persona-file CLI flags (mutually exclusive) - Add BuildPersonaSystemPrompt for persona-specific prompts - Add FormatMarkdownWithDisplay for persona display names - Update action.yml with persona and persona-file inputs - Add comprehensive tests for all new functionality - Document personas in README with examples The persona system replaces the generic 'You are an expert code reviewer' prompt with domain-specific identity, focus areas, ignore list, and severity calibration. This reduces redundancy between multiple reviewers and catches domain-specific issues that generic reviewers miss. Closes #51