docs: add review update strategy with state transition diagram
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / review (gpt-4.1, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / review (gpt-5, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
Explains the edit-in-place approach, state transition rules, worst-wins escalation, and inline comment lifecycle. Includes a Mermaid state diagram for visual reference.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
||||
# Review Update Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
review-bot uses an **edit-in-place** strategy for updating reviews. Reviews are never deleted — this preserves conversation threads on inline comments.
|
||||
|
||||
## State Transition Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
stateDiagram-v2
|
||||
[*] --> NoExistingReview: First run
|
||||
|
||||
NoExistingReview --> POST_Review: Generate findings + event
|
||||
POST_Review --> PostEscalationCheck: event == APPROVED?
|
||||
|
||||
PostEscalationCheck --> Done: No sibling blocks
|
||||
PostEscalationCheck --> Supersede_And_Repost: Sibling has REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
Supersede_And_Repost --> Done: Posted as REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
|
||||
[*] --> ExistingReviewFound: Subsequent run (sentinel match)
|
||||
|
||||
ExistingReviewFound --> CheckEscalation: Determine final event
|
||||
CheckEscalation --> CompareState: Apply worst-wins if needed
|
||||
|
||||
CompareState --> SameState: existing.state == new event
|
||||
CompareState --> StateChange: existing.state != new event
|
||||
|
||||
SameState --> Skip: Body unchanged
|
||||
SameState --> PatchBody: Body changed → PATCH in place
|
||||
|
||||
StateChange --> Escalate: APPROVED → REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
StateChange --> Downgrade: REQUEST_CHANGES → APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
Escalate --> Supersede: PATCH old body → "Superseded"
|
||||
Supersede --> POST_New_RC: POST new REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
|
||||
Downgrade --> POST_New_Approve: POST new APPROVED (old stays intact)
|
||||
|
||||
Skip --> Done
|
||||
PatchBody --> Done
|
||||
POST_New_RC --> Done
|
||||
POST_New_Approve --> Done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Action | Reason |
|
||||
|----------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| No existing review | POST new | First run |
|
||||
| Same state, same body | Skip | Nothing changed — preserve threads |
|
||||
| Same state, body changed | PATCH body | Update findings without losing threads |
|
||||
| APPROVED → REQUEST_CHANGES | Supersede old + POST new | Can always escalate; old APPROVED is no longer valid |
|
||||
| REQUEST_CHANGES → APPROVED | POST new APPROVED | Can't edit state; old REQUEST_CHANGES stays as historical record |
|
||||
| Sibling has REQUEST_CHANGES (worst-wins) | Escalate to REQUEST_CHANGES | PR must stay blocked if ANY reviewer blocks |
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Review state is immutable after POST** — Gitea has no API to change APPROVED ↔ REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
2. **Never delete reviews** — Deleting cascades to inline comments and reply threads
|
||||
3. **"Last review per user" wins** — Gitea uses the most recent review from a user for merge decisions
|
||||
4. **REQUEST_CHANGES reviews are never touched** — Their inline comments and threads are preserved as historical record
|
||||
5. **APPROVED reviews can be superseded** — When escalation is needed, mark old as superseded and POST new
|
||||
|
||||
## Worst-Wins (Shared Token)
|
||||
|
||||
When multiple reviewer roles share a token (e.g., `sonnet` and `security` both use `sonnet-review-bot`):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
CI Matrix Run:
|
||||
sonnet → REQUEST_CHANGES (findings)
|
||||
security → APPROVED (no security issues)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
security sees sibling REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
↓
|
||||
security escalates → REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
↓
|
||||
PR stays blocked ✓
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The **first-run case** (no existing review to read login from) uses a post-posting fallback:
|
||||
POST APPROVED → check siblings → if blocked, supersede own APPROVED → re-POST as REQUEST_CHANGES.
|
||||
|
||||
## Edit Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
Reviews are edited via `PATCH /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}`:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Review body**: ID obtained from the timeline API (`/issues/{index}/timeline`, type `"review"`)
|
||||
- **Inline comments**: IDs obtained from `/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments`
|
||||
- **Both are editable** by the token that created them
|
||||
- **ListReviews always returns the original body** (reads from review table, not comment table) — sentinel matching works regardless of edits
|
||||
|
||||
## Inline Comments Lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
| Event | Inline comments behavior |
|
||||
|-------|--------------------------|
|
||||
| First POST | Created on specific diff lines |
|
||||
| PATCH body (same state) | Unchanged — still current findings |
|
||||
| Supersede (state change) | Old inline comments stay (readable but on outdated code) |
|
||||
| New POST after supersede | Fresh inline comments on current diff |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user