Merge pull request 'feat: delete previous review before posting new one (#6)' (#22) from feat/6-update-existing-review into main

Reviewed-on: #22

.gitea/actions/review/action.yml

@@ -66,6 +66,14 @@ inputs:
     description: 'Print review to stdout instead of posting'
     required: false
     default: 'false'
+  update-existing:
+    description: 'Delete previous review from same bot after posting new one. Accepts: true/1/yes or false/0/no (default true)'
+    required: false
+    default: 'true'
+  system-prompt-file:
+    description: 'Local file with additional system prompt instructions (e.g. security review focus)'
+    required: false
+    default: ''
 
 runs:
   using: 'composite'
@@ -145,6 +153,8 @@ runs:
         LLM_TEMPERATURE: ${{ inputs.temperature }}
         LLM_TIMEOUT: ${{ inputs.timeout }}
         LLM_PROVIDER: ${{ inputs.llm-provider }}
+        UPDATE_EXISTING: ${{ inputs.update-existing }}
+        SYSTEM_PROMPT_FILE: ${{ inputs.system-prompt-file }}
       run: |
         ARGS=""
         if [ "${{ inputs.dry-run }}" = "true" ]; then

.gitea/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ jobs:
           - name: gpt
             token_secret: GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN
             model: gpt-4.1
+          - name: security
+            token_secret: SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN
+            model: gpt-5
+            system_prompt_file: SECURITY_REVIEW.md
     steps:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v4
       - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
@@ -44,6 +48,7 @@ jobs:
           GITEA_REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
           PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
           REVIEWER_TOKEN: ${{ secrets[matrix.token_secret] }}
+          REVIEWER_NAME: ${{ matrix.name }}
           LLM_BASE_URL: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
           LLM_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
           LLM_MODEL: ${{ matrix.model }}
@@ -51,4 +56,5 @@ jobs:
           PATTERNS_REPO: "rodin/go-patterns"
           PATTERNS_FILES: "README.md,patterns/"
           LLM_TIMEOUT: "600"
+          SYSTEM_PROMPT_FILE: ${{ matrix.system_prompt_file }}
         run: ./review-bot

README.md

@@ -1,17 +1,242 @@
 # review-bot
 
-Automated code review bot for Gitea. Fetches a pull request diff, sends it to an LLM for analysis, and posts a structured review back to the PR.
+AI-powered code review bot for Gitea pull requests. Fetches diff + context, sends to an LLM, and posts a structured review (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES) back to the PR.
 
 ## Features
 
-- Fetches PR metadata, diff, and CI status from Gitea API
-- Sends context-rich prompts to any OpenAI-compatible LLM
-- Parses structured JSON review responses
-- Posts formatted reviews (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES) back to Gitea
-- Supports custom coding conventions via repo files
-- Zero external dependencies — Go stdlib only
+- **Multi-provider**: OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic Messages API
+- **Context-aware**: Fetches full file content, conventions, language patterns, CI status
+- **Smart budget**: Automatically trims context to fit model token limits
+- **Idempotent reviews**: Posts new review, then cleans up stale ones (one review per bot)
+- **Custom prompts**: Load additional instructions from a file (e.g. security-focused review)
+- **Zero dependencies**: Go stdlib only
 
-## Usage
+## Quick Start: Composite Action
+
+The easiest way to use review-bot in your Gitea CI:
+
+```yaml
+# .gitea/workflows/review.yml
+name: Review
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    types: [opened, synchronize]
+
+jobs:
+  review:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+        with:
+          reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+          reviewer-name: code-review
+          llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+          llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+          llm-model: gpt-4.1
+```
+
+That's it. Every PR gets an automated review.
+
+## Examples
+
+### Single reviewer with conventions
+
+```yaml
+jobs:
+  review:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+        with:
+          reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+          reviewer-name: reviewer
+          llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+          llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+          llm-model: gpt-4.1
+          conventions-file: CONVENTIONS.md
+          timeout: '600'
+```
+
+### Two reviewers with different models (diversity of opinion)
+
+```yaml
+jobs:
+  review:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
+    strategy:
+      matrix:
+        include:
+          - name: gpt
+            model: gpt-4.1
+            token_secret: GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN
+          - name: claude
+            model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514
+            token_secret: CLAUDE_REVIEW_TOKEN
+            provider: anthropic
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+        with:
+          reviewer-token: ${{ secrets[matrix.token_secret] }}
+          reviewer-name: ${{ matrix.name }}
+          llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+          llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+          llm-model: ${{ matrix.model }}
+          llm-provider: ${{ matrix.provider }}
+          conventions-file: CONVENTIONS.md
+```
+
+Each reviewer posts independently and only cleans up its own stale reviews.
+
+### Multiple review types from a single bot account
+
+Use the same Gitea token but different `reviewer-name` values to run specialized reviews without needing multiple bot accounts:
+
+```yaml
+jobs:
+  review:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
+    strategy:
+      matrix:
+        include:
+          - name: code-quality
+            model: gpt-4.1
+          - name: security
+            model: gpt-4.1
+            system_prompt_file: .review/SECURITY.md
+          - name: performance
+            model: gpt-4.1
+            system_prompt_file: .review/PERFORMANCE.md
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+        with:
+          reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+          reviewer-name: ${{ matrix.name }}
+          llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+          llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+          llm-model: ${{ matrix.model }}
+          system-prompt-file: ${{ matrix.system_prompt_file }}
+```
+
+The sentinel `<!-- review-bot:security -->` ensures the security review only replaces previous security reviews, never the code-quality or performance reviews.
+
+### With language patterns from another repo
+
+```yaml
+- uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+  with:
+    reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+    reviewer-name: reviewer
+    llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+    llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+    llm-model: gpt-4.1
+    conventions-file: CLAUDE.md
+    patterns-repo: rodin/go-patterns,rodin/kubernetes-conventions
+    patterns-files: "README.md,patterns/"
+```
+
+Pattern repos are fetched at review time. The reviewer uses them as criteria for idiomatic code.
+
+### Dry run (test without posting)
+
+```yaml
+- uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+  with:
+    reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+    reviewer-name: test
+    llm-base-url: ${{ secrets.LLM_BASE_URL }}
+    llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.LLM_API_KEY }}
+    llm-model: gpt-4.1
+    dry-run: 'true'
+```
+
+Prints the review to CI logs without posting to the PR. Useful for testing prompt changes.
+
+### Using Anthropic directly
+
+```yaml
+- uses: https://gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/.gitea/actions/review@v0.1.0
+  with:
+    reviewer-token: ${{ secrets.REVIEW_TOKEN }}
+    reviewer-name: claude
+    llm-base-url: https://api.anthropic.com
+    llm-api-key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
+    llm-model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514
+    llm-provider: anthropic
+```
+
+## Action Inputs
+
+| Input | Required | Default | Description |
+|-------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| `reviewer-token` | Yes | — | Gitea token for posting reviews (needs `write:issue`, `write:repository`) |
+| `reviewer-name` | No | `""` | Logical identity for this reviewer. Used as sentinel for idempotent cleanup. Set this when running multiple review bots on the same PR. |
+| `llm-base-url` | Yes | — | LLM API base URL |
+| `llm-api-key` | Yes | — | LLM API key |
+| `llm-model` | Yes | — | Model name |
+| `llm-provider` | No | `openai` | API provider: `openai` or `anthropic` |
+| `conventions-file` | No | `""` | Path to coding conventions file in the repo |
+| `patterns-repo` | No | `""` | Comma-separated repos with language patterns (e.g. `rodin/go-patterns`) |
+| `patterns-files` | No | `README.md` | Files/directories to fetch from pattern repos |
+| `system-prompt-file` | No | `""` | Local file with additional system prompt instructions |
+| `temperature` | No | `0` | LLM temperature (0 = server default) |
+| `timeout` | No | `300` | LLM request timeout in seconds |
+| `dry-run` | No | `false` | Print review to stdout instead of posting |
+| `update-existing` | No | `true` | Delete previous review from same bot before posting. Accepts: true/1/yes or false/0/no |
+| `version` | No | `latest` | review-bot version to install |
+
+## How Review Cleanup Works
+
+When `reviewer-name` is set, the bot embeds a hidden sentinel in each review:
+
+```html
+<!-- review-bot:code-review -->
+```
+
+On the next run, it finds and deletes any review containing its own sentinel (except the one it just posted). This means:
+
+- **One review per bot per PR** — no clutter from repeated pushes
+- **Multiple bots coexist** — each only cleans up its own reviews
+- **Same token, different roles** — a single bot account can post "code-review" and "security" reviews without conflict
+- **No extra permissions** — identity comes from the sentinel, not the API
+
+If `reviewer-name` is empty, cleanup is skipped (reviews stack like before).
+
+### Shared Token: Worst-Wins Behavior
+
+When multiple review types share the same Gitea bot account (e.g. code-quality and security), Gitea determines the user's approval state from their **most recent review**. This creates a race condition: if security finds issues (REQUEST_CHANGES) but code-quality finishes last (APPROVE), the PR appears approved.
+
+review-bot handles this automatically with **worst-wins reconciliation**: before posting, each job checks whether any sibling review from the same user already has REQUEST_CHANGES. If so and this job would post APPROVE, it posts as REQUEST_CHANGES instead — maintaining the block. This ensures the PR stays blocked until all checks pass, regardless of execution order.
+
+**If you need independent approval/block per review type**, use separate Gitea bot accounts with their own tokens.
+
+## Custom Review Prompts
+
+Use `system-prompt-file` to specialize the review focus. The file contents are appended to the base system prompt as "Additional Review Instructions."
+
+Example `SECURITY_REVIEW.md`:
+
+```markdown
+You are performing a security-focused code review.
+
+Focus areas:
+- Injection attacks (SQL, command, path traversal, template)
+- Authentication/Authorization (missing checks, privilege escalation)
+- Secrets exposure (hardcoded credentials, tokens in logs)
+- Input validation (unsanitized input, unsafe deserialization)
+- Race conditions (TOCTOU, unsynchronized shared state)
+
+Rules:
+- Only report findings with security implications
+- Ignore style, naming, and general code quality
+- MAJOR = exploitable vulnerability, MINOR = hardening opportunity, NIT = theoretical risk
+- If no security-relevant changes exist, APPROVE with empty findings
+```
+
+## CLI Usage
 
 ```bash
 review-bot \
@@ -19,71 +244,74 @@ review-bot \
   --repo owner/name \
   --pr 42 \
   --reviewer-token "$GITEA_TOKEN" \
+  --reviewer-name "code-review" \
   --llm-base-url https://api.openai.com/v1 \
   --llm-api-key "$OPENAI_API_KEY" \
-  --llm-model gpt-4 \
-  --reviewer-name "Sonnet" \
-  --conventions-file CONVENTIONS.md \
-  --dry-run
+  --llm-model gpt-4.1 \
+  --conventions-file CONVENTIONS.md
 ```
 
 ## Environment Variables
 
-All flags can be set via environment variables:
+All flags have environment variable equivalents:
 
-| Flag | Env Var | Required | Description |
-|------|---------|----------|-------------|
-| `--gitea-url` | `GITEA_URL` | Yes | Gitea instance base URL |
-| `--repo` | `GITEA_REPO` | Yes | Repository in `owner/name` format |
-| `--pr` | `PR_NUMBER` | Yes | Pull request number |
-| `--reviewer-token` | `REVIEWER_TOKEN` | Yes | Gitea API token for posting reviews |
-| `--llm-base-url` | `LLM_BASE_URL` | Yes | OpenAI-compatible API base URL |
-| `--llm-api-key` | `LLM_API_KEY` | Yes | LLM API key |
-| `--llm-model` | `LLM_MODEL` | Yes | Model identifier |
-| `--reviewer-name` | `REVIEWER_NAME` | No | Display name in review footer |
-| `--conventions-file` | `CONVENTIONS_FILE` | No | Path to conventions file in repo |
-| `--dry-run` | — | No | Print review to stdout instead of posting |
+| Flag | Env Var |
+|------|---------|
+| `--gitea-url` | `GITEA_URL` |
+| `--repo` | `GITEA_REPO` |
+| `--pr` | `PR_NUMBER` |
+| `--reviewer-token` | `REVIEWER_TOKEN` |
+| `--reviewer-name` | `REVIEWER_NAME` |
+| `--llm-base-url` | `LLM_BASE_URL` |
+| `--llm-api-key` | `LLM_API_KEY` |
+| `--llm-model` | `LLM_MODEL` |
+| `--llm-provider` | `LLM_PROVIDER` |
+| `--conventions-file` | `CONVENTIONS_FILE` |
+| `--patterns-repo` | `PATTERNS_REPO` |
+| `--patterns-files` | `PATTERNS_FILES` |
+| `--system-prompt-file` | `SYSTEM_PROMPT_FILE` |
+| `--llm-temperature` | `LLM_TEMPERATURE` |
+| `--llm-timeout` | `LLM_TIMEOUT` |
+| `--update-existing` | `UPDATE_EXISTING` |
 
-## Adding to a Gitea Repository
+## Setup
 
-1. Build the binary or use the CI workflow approach (build in CI).
+1. **Create a Gitea bot account** (e.g. `review-bot`)
+2. **Generate a token** with scopes: `write:issue`, `write:repository`
+3. **Add secrets** to your Gitea repo (Settings → Actions → Secrets):
+   - `REVIEW_TOKEN` — the bot's Gitea token
+   - `LLM_BASE_URL` — your LLM endpoint
+   - `LLM_API_KEY` — your LLM key
+4. **Add the workflow** (see Quick Start above)
 
-2. Add secrets to your Gitea repo (Settings → Actions → Secrets):
-   - `SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN` — Gitea token for the Sonnet reviewer account
-   - `GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN` — Gitea token for the GPT reviewer account
-   - `LLM_BASE_URL` — Your LLM API endpoint
-   - `LLM_API_KEY` — Your LLM API key
+### Token Scopes Required
 
-3. Copy `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` to your repo (or adapt it).
+| Scope | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|
+| `write:issue` | Post and delete reviews |
+| `write:repository` | Read PR diffs, file content, commit statuses |
 
-4. On every PR, the bot will:
-   - Run tests and vet
-   - Build review-bot
-   - Post reviews from each configured LLM reviewer
+No `read:user` scope needed — the bot identifies itself from the review response.
 
 ## Development
 
 ```bash
-# Run tests
-go test ./...
-
-# Run vet
-go vet ./...
-
-# Build
+go test ./...        # Unit tests
+go vet ./...         # Static analysis
 go build -o review-bot ./cmd/review-bot
 
-# Integration tests (requires env vars)
+# Integration tests (requires env vars set)
 go test -tags=integration ./...
 ```
 
 ## Architecture
 
 ```
-cmd/review-bot/     CLI entrypoint
-gitea/              Gitea API client
-llm/                OpenAI-compatible LLM client
+cmd/review-bot/     CLI entrypoint + orchestration
+gitea/              Gitea API client (reviews, PRs, files)
+llm/                Multi-provider LLM client (OpenAI + Anthropic)
 review/             Prompt building, response parsing, formatting
+budget/             Token estimation + context trimming
 ```
 
 ## License

SECURITY_REVIEW.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+You are performing a security-focused code review. Your primary concern is identifying vulnerabilities, not general code quality.
+
+Focus areas:
+- **Injection attacks**: SQL injection, command injection, path traversal, template injection
+- **Authentication/Authorization**: Missing auth checks, privilege escalation, IDOR
+- **Secrets exposure**: Hardcoded credentials, API keys in code, tokens in logs
+- **Input validation**: Untrusted input used without sanitization, unsafe deserialization
+- **Cryptography**: Weak algorithms, predictable randomness, improper key management
+- **Error handling**: Information leakage in error messages, stack traces exposed
+- **Dependencies**: Known vulnerable patterns, unsafe use of external libraries
+- **Race conditions**: TOCTOU bugs, unsynchronized shared state
+- **Resource exhaustion**: Unbounded allocations, missing timeouts, denial-of-service vectors
+
+Rules for this review:
+- Only report findings with actual security implications. Ignore style, naming, and general code quality.
+- Severity mapping: MAJOR = exploitable vulnerability or data exposure. MINOR = defense-in-depth improvement or hardening opportunity. NIT = theoretical concern with low practical risk.
+- If the code has no security-relevant changes, APPROVE with an empty findings list.
+- Do not duplicate findings that a standard code review would catch (logic bugs, missing error checks) unless they have a security dimension.

cmd/review-bot/main.go

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import (
 	"fmt"
 	"log"
 	"os"
+	"path/filepath"
 	"strconv"
 	"strings"
 	"time"
@@ -30,9 +31,11 @@ func main() {
 	llmAPIKey := flag.String("llm-api-key", envOrDefault("LLM_API_KEY", ""), "LLM API key")
 	llmModel := flag.String("llm-model", envOrDefault("LLM_MODEL", ""), "LLM model name")
 	conventionsFile := flag.String("conventions-file", envOrDefault("CONVENTIONS_FILE", ""), "Conventions file path in repo (e.g. CLAUDE.md)")
+	systemPromptFile := flag.String("system-prompt-file", envOrDefault("SYSTEM_PROMPT_FILE", ""), "Local file with additional system prompt instructions")
 	patternsRepo := flag.String("patterns-repo", envOrDefault("PATTERNS_REPO", ""), "Repo with language patterns (e.g. rodin/elixir-patterns)")
 	patternsFiles := flag.String("patterns-files", envOrDefault("PATTERNS_FILES", "README.md"), "Comma-separated file paths to fetch from patterns repo")
 	dryRun := flag.Bool("dry-run", false, "Print review to stdout instead of posting")
+	updateExisting := flag.Bool("update-existing", envOrDefaultBool("UPDATE_EXISTING", true), "Delete previous review from same bot before posting (default true)")
 	llmTemp := flag.Float64("llm-temperature", envOrDefaultFloat("LLM_TEMPERATURE", 0), "LLM temperature (0 = server default)")
 	llmTimeout := flag.Int("llm-timeout", envOrDefaultInt("LLM_TIMEOUT", 300), "LLM request timeout in seconds (default 300)")
 	llmProvider := flag.String("llm-provider", envOrDefault("LLM_PROVIDER", "openai"), "LLM API provider: openai or anthropic")
@@ -54,6 +57,11 @@ func main() {
 		os.Exit(1)
 	}
 
+	// Validate reviewer-name: only safe characters allowed in sentinel
+	if err := validateReviewerName(*reviewerName); err != nil {
+		log.Fatalf("%v", err)
+	}
+
 	// Parse repo owner/name
 	parts := strings.SplitN(*repo, "/", 2)
 	if len(parts) != 2 {
@@ -149,9 +157,45 @@ func main() {
 		log.Printf("Loaded patterns from %s (%d bytes)", *patternsRepo, len(patterns))
 	}
 
+	// Step 6b: Load additional system prompt if specified
+	additionalPrompt := ""
+	if *systemPromptFile != "" {
+		workspace := os.Getenv("GITHUB_WORKSPACE")
+		if workspace == "" {
+			workspace, _ = os.Getwd()
+		}
+		absWorkspace, err := filepath.Abs(workspace)
+		if err != nil {
+			log.Fatalf("Failed to resolve workspace path: %v", err)
+		}
+		promptPath := filepath.Join(absWorkspace, *systemPromptFile)
+		promptPath = filepath.Clean(promptPath)
+		if !strings.HasPrefix(promptPath, absWorkspace+string(filepath.Separator)) && promptPath != absWorkspace {
+			log.Fatalf("system-prompt-file resolves outside workspace (got %q, workspace %q)", promptPath, absWorkspace)
+		}
+		// Resolve symlinks and re-validate to prevent symlink traversal
+		resolvedPath, err := filepath.EvalSymlinks(promptPath)
+		if err != nil {
+			log.Fatalf("Failed to resolve system prompt file %q: %v", promptPath, err)
+		}
+		if !strings.HasPrefix(resolvedPath, absWorkspace+string(filepath.Separator)) && resolvedPath != absWorkspace {
+			log.Fatalf("system-prompt-file symlink resolves outside workspace (got %q, workspace %q)", resolvedPath, absWorkspace)
+		}
+		data, err := os.ReadFile(resolvedPath)
+		if err != nil {
+			log.Fatalf("Failed to read system prompt file %q: %v", promptPath, err)
+		}
+		additionalPrompt = string(data)
+		log.Printf("Loaded system prompt file: %s (%d bytes)", *systemPromptFile, len(additionalPrompt))
+	}
+
 	// Step 7: Budget-aware prompt assembly
+	systemBase := review.BuildSystemBase()
+	if additionalPrompt != "" {
+		systemBase += "\n\n## Additional Review Instructions\n\n" + additionalPrompt
+	}
 	sections := budget.Sections{
-		SystemBase:  review.BuildSystemBase(),
+		SystemBase:  systemBase,
 		Patterns:    patterns,
 		Conventions: conventions,
 		FileContext: fileContext,
@@ -195,11 +239,49 @@ func main() {
 		return
 	}
 
+	sentinel := fmt.Sprintf("<!-- review-bot:%s -->", *reviewerName)
+
 	log.Printf("Posting review (event=%s)...", event)
-	if err := giteaClient.PostReview(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber, event, reviewBody); err != nil {
+	posted, err := giteaClient.PostReview(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber, event, reviewBody)
+	if err != nil {
 		log.Fatalf("Failed to post review: %v", err)
 	}
-	log.Printf("Review posted successfully!")
+	log.Printf("Review posted (id=%d, user=%s)", posted.ID, posted.User.Login)
+
+	// Delete stale reviews from this bot using sentinel matching
+	if *updateExisting && *reviewerName != "" {
+		reviews, err := giteaClient.ListReviews(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber)
+		if err != nil {
+			log.Printf("Warning: could not list existing reviews: %v", err)
+		} else {
+			for _, r := range reviews {
+				if r.ID != posted.ID && r.User.Login == posted.User.Login && strings.Contains(r.Body, sentinel) {
+					if err := giteaClient.DeleteReview(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber, r.ID); err != nil {
+						log.Printf("Warning: could not delete old review %d: %v", r.ID, err)
+					} else {
+						log.Printf("Deleted stale review %d", r.ID)
+					}
+				}
+			}
+
+			// Worst-wins: if we posted APPROVE but a sibling review from the
+			// same user (same token, different role) has REQUEST_CHANGES,
+			// delete ours and re-post as REQUEST_CHANGES to maintain the block.
+			if event == "APPROVED" && shouldEscalate(reviews, posted.ID, posted.User.Login, sentinel) {
+				log.Printf("Sibling review has REQUEST_CHANGES; escalating")
+				if err := giteaClient.DeleteReview(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber, posted.ID); err != nil {
+					log.Printf("Warning: could not delete review for escalation: %v", err)
+				} else {
+					_, err := giteaClient.PostReview(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber, "REQUEST_CHANGES", reviewBody)
+					if err != nil {
+						log.Printf("Warning: could not re-post as REQUEST_CHANGES: %v", err)
+					} else {
+						log.Printf("Review escalated to REQUEST_CHANGES")
+					}
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 // fetchFileContext fetches the full content of modified files from the PR branch.
@@ -333,3 +415,37 @@ func envOrDefaultInt(key string, defaultVal int) int {
 	}
 	return defaultVal
 }
+
+func envOrDefaultBool(key string, defaultVal bool) bool {
+	v := strings.TrimSpace(strings.ToLower(os.Getenv(key)))
+	if v == "" {
+		return defaultVal
+	}
+	return v == "true" || v == "1" || v == "yes"
+}
+
+// validateReviewerName checks that the name contains only safe characters
+// for embedding in an HTML comment sentinel ([a-zA-Z0-9_-]).
+func validateReviewerName(name string) error {
+	if name == "" {
+		return nil
+	}
+	for _, ch := range name {
+		if !((ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z') || (ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || ch == '-' || ch == '_') {
+			return fmt.Errorf("reviewer-name must contain only [a-zA-Z0-9_-] (got %q)", name)
+		}
+	}
+	return nil
+}
+
+// shouldEscalate checks if the current APPROVED review should be escalated
+// to REQUEST_CHANGES because a sibling bot review (same user, different role)
+// already has REQUEST_CHANGES.
+func shouldEscalate(reviews []gitea.Review, postedID int64, postedLogin, ownSentinel string) bool {
+	for _, r := range reviews {
+		if r.ID != postedID && !r.Stale && r.User.Login == postedLogin && r.State == "REQUEST_CHANGES" && strings.Contains(r.Body, "<!-- review-bot:") && !strings.Contains(r.Body, ownSentinel) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}

cmd/review-bot/main_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+package main
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/gitea"
+)
+
+func TestValidateReviewerName(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name    string
+		input   string
+		wantErr bool
+	}{
+		{"valid simple", "sonnet", false},
+		{"valid with dash", "code-review", false},
+		{"valid with underscore", "my_bot", false},
+		{"valid alphanumeric", "bot123", false},
+		{"valid uppercase", "MyBot", false},
+		{"empty is valid", "", false},
+		{"invalid html close", "foo-->", true},
+		{"invalid space", "my bot", true},
+		{"invalid dot", "my.bot", true},
+		{"invalid slash", "my/bot", true},
+		{"invalid angle", "bot<script>", true},
+		{"invalid colon", "bot:name", true},
+	}
+
+	for _, tc := range tests {
+		t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			err := validateReviewerName(tc.input)
+			if tc.wantErr && err == nil {
+				t.Errorf("expected error for %q, got nil", tc.input)
+			}
+			if !tc.wantErr && err != nil {
+				t.Errorf("expected no error for %q, got %v", tc.input, err)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func makeReview(id int64, login, state string, stale bool, body string) gitea.Review {
+	r := gitea.Review{
+		ID:    id,
+		Body:  body,
+		State: state,
+		Stale: stale,
+	}
+	r.User.Login = login
+	return r
+}
+
+func TestShouldEscalate(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name        string
+		reviews     []gitea.Review
+		postedID    int64
+		postedLogin string
+		ownSentinel string
+		want        bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:        "no reviews",
+			reviews:     nil,
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "sibling same user has REQUEST_CHANGES",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", false, "bad\n<!-- review-bot:security -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "sibling different user has REQUEST_CHANGES (should NOT escalate)",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "other-bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", false, "bad\n<!-- review-bot:gpt -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "same user REQUEST_CHANGES but stale (should NOT escalate)",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", true, "old\n<!-- review-bot:security -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "same user same sentinel (own stale review, should NOT escalate)",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", false, "old\n<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "same user APPROVED sibling (should NOT escalate)",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "bot", "APPROVED", false, "good\n<!-- review-bot:security -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "human REQUEST_CHANGES no sentinel (should NOT escalate)",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(101, "bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", false, "please fix this"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "skip own posted ID",
+			reviews: []gitea.Review{
+				makeReview(100, "bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", false, "x\n<!-- review-bot:security -->"),
+			},
+			postedID:    100,
+			postedLogin: "bot",
+			ownSentinel: "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->",
+			want:        false,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tc := range tests {
+		t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			got := shouldEscalate(tc.reviews, tc.postedID, tc.postedLogin, tc.ownSentinel)
+			if got != tc.want {
+				t.Errorf("shouldEscalate() = %v, want %v", got, tc.want)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}

gitea/client.go

@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ func (c *Client) GetFileContentRef(ctx context.Context, owner, repo, filepath, r
 	return string(body), nil
 }
 
-// PostReview submits a review to a PR.
+// PostReview submits a review to a PR and returns the created review.
 // event should be "APPROVED" or "REQUEST_CHANGES".
-func (c *Client) PostReview(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int, event, body string) error {
+func (c *Client) PostReview(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int, event, body string) (*Review, error) {
 	reqURL := fmt.Sprintf("%s/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", c.baseURL, owner, repo, number)
 
 	payload := struct {
@@ -144,27 +144,36 @@ func (c *Client) PostReview(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int,
 
 	data, err := json.Marshal(payload)
 	if err != nil {
-		return fmt.Errorf("marshal review payload: %w", err)
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("marshal review payload: %w", err)
 	}
 
 	req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, reqURL, bytes.NewReader(data))
 	if err != nil {
-		return fmt.Errorf("create review request: %w", err)
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("create review request: %w", err)
 	}
 	req.Header.Set("Authorization", "token "+c.token)
 	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
 
 	resp, err := c.http.Do(req)
 	if err != nil {
-		return fmt.Errorf("post review: %w", err)
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("post review: %w", err)
 	}
 	defer resp.Body.Close()
 
 	if resp.StatusCode < 200 || resp.StatusCode >= 300 {
 		respBody, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
-		return fmt.Errorf("post review failed (status %d): %s", resp.StatusCode, string(respBody))
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("post review failed (status %d): %s", resp.StatusCode, string(respBody))
 	}
-	return nil
+
+	respBody, err := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("read review response: %w", err)
+	}
+	var review Review
+	if err := json.Unmarshal(respBody, &review); err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("parse review response: %w", err)
+	}
+	return &review, nil
 }
 
 func (c *Client) doGet(ctx context.Context, reqURL string) ([]byte, error) {
@@ -266,3 +275,71 @@ func (c *Client) GetAllFilesInPath(ctx context.Context, owner, repo, path string
 	}
 	return results, nil
 }
+
+// Review represents a pull request review from the Gitea API.
+type Review struct {
+	ID   int64  `json:"id"`
+	Body string `json:"body"`
+	User struct {
+		Login string `json:"login"`
+	} `json:"user"`
+	State string `json:"state"`
+	Stale bool   `json:"stale"`
+}
+
+// ListReviews returns all reviews on a pull request.
+// Paginates through all pages to ensure no reviews are missed.
+func (c *Client) ListReviews(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int) ([]Review, error) {
+	const pageSize = 50
+	var all []Review
+	for page := 1; ; page++ {
+		reqURL := fmt.Sprintf("%s/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews?limit=%d&page=%d",
+			c.baseURL,
+			url.PathEscape(owner),
+			url.PathEscape(repo),
+			number,
+			pageSize,
+			page)
+		body, err := c.doGet(ctx, reqURL)
+		if err != nil {
+			return nil, fmt.Errorf("list reviews (page %d): %w", page, err)
+		}
+		var batch []Review
+		if err := json.Unmarshal(body, &batch); err != nil {
+			return nil, fmt.Errorf("parse reviews (page %d): %w", page, err)
+		}
+		all = append(all, batch...)
+		if len(batch) < pageSize {
+			break
+		}
+	}
+	return all, nil
+}
+
+// DeleteReview deletes a review by ID. The token must belong to the review author.
+func (c *Client) DeleteReview(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int, reviewID int64) error {
+	reqURL := fmt.Sprintf("%s/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d",
+		c.baseURL,
+		url.PathEscape(owner),
+		url.PathEscape(repo),
+		number,
+		reviewID)
+
+	req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodDelete, reqURL, nil)
+	if err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("create delete request: %w", err)
+	}
+	req.Header.Set("Authorization", "token "+c.token)
+
+	resp, err := c.http.Do(req)
+	if err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("delete review: %w", err)
+	}
+	defer resp.Body.Close()
+
+	if resp.StatusCode < 200 || resp.StatusCode >= 300 {
+		respBody, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
+		return fmt.Errorf("delete review failed (status %d): %s", resp.StatusCode, string(respBody))
+	}
+	return nil
+}

gitea/client_test.go

@@ -123,15 +123,21 @@ func TestPostReview(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 
 		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)
-		w.Write([]byte(`{}`))
+		w.Write([]byte(`{"id":100,"user":{"login":"review-bot"},"state":"APPROVED","stale":false}`))
 	}))
 	defer server.Close()
 
 	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
-	err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 3, "APPROVED", "LGTM")
+	review, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 3, "APPROVED", "LGTM")
 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
 	}
+	if review.ID != 100 {
+		t.Errorf("expected review ID 100, got %d", review.ID)
+	}
+	if review.User.Login != "review-bot" {
+		t.Errorf("expected user login %q, got %q", "review-bot", review.User.Login)
+	}
 }
 
 func TestGetPullRequest_Non200(t *testing.T) {
@@ -169,7 +175,7 @@ func TestPostReview_Non200(t *testing.T) {
 	defer server.Close()
 
 	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
-	err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "APPROVED", "test")
+	_, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "APPROVED", "test")
 	if err == nil {
 		t.Fatal("expected error for 403, got nil")
 	}
@@ -318,3 +324,105 @@ func TestEscapePath(t *testing.T) {
 		})
 	}
 }
+
+func TestListReviews(t *testing.T) {
+	pageCount := 0
+	server := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		if r.URL.Path != "/api/v1/repos/owner/repo/pulls/5/reviews" {
+			t.Errorf("unexpected path: %s", r.URL.Path)
+		}
+		if r.URL.Query().Get("limit") != "50" {
+			t.Errorf("expected limit=50, got %s", r.URL.Query().Get("limit"))
+		}
+		pageCount++
+		w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
+		// Return 2 results (less than page size) to signal end
+		w.Write([]byte(`[{"id":10,"user":{"login":"bot-a"},"state":"APPROVED","stale":false},{"id":11,"user":{"login":"bot-b"},"state":"REQUEST_CHANGES","stale":true}]`))
+	}))
+	defer server.Close()
+
+	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
+	reviews, err := client.ListReviews(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 5)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
+	}
+	if len(reviews) != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("expected 2 reviews, got %d", len(reviews))
+	}
+	if reviews[0].User.Login != "bot-a" {
+		t.Errorf("expected bot-a, got %s", reviews[0].User.Login)
+	}
+	if pageCount != 1 {
+		t.Errorf("expected 1 page fetch (results < page size), got %d", pageCount)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestListReviews_Pagination(t *testing.T) {
+	pageCount := 0
+	server := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		pageCount++
+		page := r.URL.Query().Get("page")
+		w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
+		if page == "1" {
+			// Return exactly 50 items to trigger next page fetch
+			items := "["
+			for i := 0; i < 50; i++ {
+				if i > 0 {
+					items += ","
+				}
+				items += fmt.Sprintf(`{"id":%d,"user":{"login":"bot"},"state":"APPROVED","stale":false}`, i+1)
+			}
+			items += "]"
+			w.Write([]byte(items))
+		} else {
+			// Page 2: return fewer than 50 to signal end
+			w.Write([]byte(`[{"id":51,"user":{"login":"bot"},"state":"APPROVED","stale":false}]`))
+		}
+	}))
+	defer server.Close()
+
+	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
+	reviews, err := client.ListReviews(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 5)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
+	}
+	if len(reviews) != 51 {
+		t.Fatalf("expected 51 reviews across 2 pages, got %d", len(reviews))
+	}
+	if pageCount != 2 {
+		t.Errorf("expected 2 page fetches, got %d", pageCount)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestDeleteReview(t *testing.T) {
+	server := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		if r.URL.Path != "/api/v1/repos/owner/repo/pulls/5/reviews/10" {
+			t.Errorf("unexpected path: %s", r.URL.Path)
+		}
+		if r.Method != "DELETE" {
+			t.Errorf("expected DELETE, got %s", r.Method)
+		}
+		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusNoContent)
+	}))
+	defer server.Close()
+
+	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
+	err := client.DeleteReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 5, 10)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestDeleteReview_Forbidden(t *testing.T) {
+	server := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusForbidden)
+		w.Write([]byte(`{"message":"forbidden"}`))
+	}))
+	defer server.Close()
+
+	client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
+	err := client.DeleteReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 5, 10)
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Fatal("expected error for 403, got nil")
+	}
+}

review/formatter.go

@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ import (
 func FormatMarkdown(result *ReviewResult, reviewerName string) string {
 	var sb strings.Builder
 
+	if reviewerName != "" {
+		title := strings.ToUpper(reviewerName[:1]) + reviewerName[1:]
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("# %s Review\n\n", title))
+	}
+
 	sb.WriteString("## Summary\n\n")
 	sb.WriteString(result.Summary)
 	sb.WriteString("\n\n")
@@ -30,6 +35,8 @@ func FormatMarkdown(result *ReviewResult, reviewerName string) string {
 
 	if reviewerName != "" {
 		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n---\n*Review by %s*\n", reviewerName))
+		// Hidden sentinel for identifying this bot's reviews during cleanup
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n<!-- review-bot:%s -->\n", reviewerName))
 	}
 
 	return sb.String()

review/formatter_test.go

@@ -116,3 +116,46 @@ func TestGiteaEvent(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+func TestFormatMarkdown_Sentinel(t *testing.T) {
+	result := &ReviewResult{
+		Verdict:        "APPROVE",
+		Summary:        "All good.",
+		Recommendation: "Merge it.",
+	}
+	output := FormatMarkdown(result, "security")
+	if !strings.Contains(output, "<!-- review-bot:security -->") {
+		t.Error("expected sentinel comment in output")
+	}
+
+	// Empty reviewer name should NOT have sentinel
+	output2 := FormatMarkdown(result, "")
+	if strings.Contains(output2, "<!-- review-bot") {
+		t.Error("should not contain sentinel when reviewer name is empty")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestFormatMarkdown_RoleTitle(t *testing.T) {
+	result := &ReviewResult{
+		Verdict:        "APPROVE",
+		Summary:        "All good.",
+		Recommendation: "Merge it.",
+	}
+
+	// With reviewer name: should have title header
+	output := FormatMarkdown(result, "security")
+	if !strings.Contains(output, "# Security Review\n") {
+		t.Error("expected '# Security Review' header when reviewer name is set")
+	}
+
+	output2 := FormatMarkdown(result, "gpt")
+	if !strings.Contains(output2, "# Gpt Review\n") {
+		t.Error("expected '# Gpt Review' header")
+	}
+
+	// Without reviewer name: no title header
+	output3 := FormatMarkdown(result, "")
+	if strings.Contains(output3, "# ") && strings.Contains(output3, " Review\n") {
+		t.Error("should not contain role title header when reviewer name is empty")
+	}
+}