Rodin
6af8a6ee10
Break the monolithic 3249-line findings file into 29 individual files, one per experiment. Each file is named YYYY-MM-DD-NN-slug.md for easy chronological sorting and discovery. No content changes — purely structural reorganization.
18 lines
1003 B
Markdown
18 lines
1003 B
Markdown
# Finding 7: Emerging role assignments (pattern, not conclusion)
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2026-04-26 (one day of intensive work — treat as hypothesis)
|
|
|
|
- Opus (via Claude Code): complex generation needing deep project context.
|
|
Rich context: CLAUDE.md, full codebase access, design docs. Broad mandate.
|
|
- Sonnet: parallel volume work (5 subagents drafting simultaneously).
|
|
Rich context per section, constrained output scope.
|
|
- GPT-5: independent analytical review. Rich context (diff + files + issue).
|
|
Best when task is bounded and explicit.
|
|
- GPT-4.1 Mini: focused narrow analysis (bias detection). Minimal context,
|
|
precise question. Cheap and fast.
|
|
- **Takeaway:** The role assignment matters, but so does the context shape.
|
|
Opus gets broad context + broad mandate. Sonnet gets broad context +
|
|
narrow scope. GPT-5 gets rich context + explicit task. GPT-4.1 Mini gets
|
|
minimal context + laser question. We haven't tested swapping these
|
|
combinations — that's where the real learning will come from.
|