be394efd0b
Patterns are prescriptive — follow them. Conventions are descriptive — study for ideas. Clarifies repo purpose, directory structure, and how to use patterns during development and review.
32 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
32 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Go Patterns
|
|
|
|
**Prescriptive.** Follow these when writing Go code.
|
|
|
|
A pattern is a reusable solution to a recurring problem. Each one has:
|
|
- **When to use** — the problem it solves
|
|
- **When NOT to use** — where it causes harm
|
|
- **Why** — the reasoning, not just the rule
|
|
- **Source citations** — verified file:line from real codebases
|
|
|
|
These are derived from what mature Go codebases *actually do*, not opinions or blog posts.
|
|
|
|
## Structure
|
|
|
|
- `patterns/` — what to do (interfaces, errors, concurrency, testing, packages, etc.)
|
|
- `smells/` — what NOT to do (anti-patterns, common mistakes)
|
|
- `sources/` — reference material from specific projects (golang/go, Prometheus). Study for ideas, don't copy blindly.
|
|
|
|
## How to use
|
|
|
|
1. **Before writing code:** check if a relevant pattern exists
|
|
2. **During review:** verify code follows documented patterns
|
|
3. **If code deviates:** either fix it or document why the deviation is justified
|
|
|
|
## Patterns vs Conventions
|
|
|
|
**Pattern** = prescriptive. "When you face X, do Y." Language-scoped. Follow these.
|
|
|
|
**Convention** = descriptive. "Project Z does it this way." Context-specific. Study for ideas — applying another project's conventions to yours without understanding their constraints causes harm.
|
|
|
|
The `sources/` directory is convention material absorbed from thin repos. The `patterns/` directory is what you actually follow.
|