d0b0b0b211
CI / test (push) Successful in 24s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
CI / review (gpt-5, security, ., rodin/security-patterns, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (push) Has been skipped
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
Dev Loop Health Check — 2026-05-15 01:28 UTC
Status: ✅ OPTIMAL
Test Results
- All packages: PASS ✅ (6/6, fresh -count=1 run)
- Build: ✅ successful
- Vet: ✅ clean
Coverage (current)
| Package | Coverage |
|---|---|
| budget | 91.8% |
| cmd/review-bot | 46.1% |
| gitea | 85.2% |
| github | 86.3% |
| llm | 81.3% |
| review | 92.0% |
Recent Activity (since last run ~00:55 UTC)
- No new commits since
2f085fd(orphaned file cleanup) - No open issues or PRs
- Working tree: clean, up to date with origin/main
Notes on 0% Coverage in vcs.go
giteaVCSAdapterandgithubVCSAdaptermethods all show 0% — expected- These are thin delegation wrappers; real logic is in
gitea/andgithub/packages which are well-tested (85-86%) - Could be covered via integration test, but risk/reward is low given underlying methods are tested
Next Phase Priorities
- PR Submission (#132+) — Enable review-bot to create PRs (3–5 days)
github.Client.DismissReview— method was in orphaned files, not yet ingithub/client.go; consider filing issue- GitHub Enterprise Support — Enterprise URL patterns, token scopes (2–3 days)
- Increase cmd/review-bot coverage —
main()itself is 26.5%; worth filing issue for integration test harness - Performance & Observability — Metrics, load testing, audit logging (5–7 days)
System Health
- ✅ All tests passing
- ✅ No warnings or lint issues
- ✅ Code is clean and organized
- ✅ No open issues or PRs on Gitea
- ✅ Ready for next development cycle
Next check: ~06:30 AM UTC (May 15) Action: Ready for issue creation or new feature work