Files
review-bot/vcs/check_test.go
T
claw 359f73c395 fix(vcs): address PR #83 review findings (round 2)
- Extract named HeadRef and UserInfo structs from anonymous structs
  in PullRequest and Review (comments 16615, 16616)
- Change ReviewEventApprove value from "APPROVED" to "APPROVE" to
  represent the action, not the state; document adapter translation
  responsibility (comment 16621)
- Add doc comment on ReviewComment.CommitID noting optionality (16531)
- Move compile-time assertion from check.go (//go:build ignore) to
  check_test.go with a "phase2" build tag — removes gitea adapter
  import from the vcs package (comment 16622)
- check.go misleading comment was already fixed in prior commit (16532, 16539)
- Sha→SHA, typed ReviewEvent, duplicate package doc already resolved (16537, 16538, 16530)
2026-05-13 06:42:39 -07:00

28 lines
1.1 KiB
Go

//go:build phase2
package vcs_test
import (
"gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/gitea"
"gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/vcs"
)
// Compile-time assertion: documents the gap between gitea.Client and vcs.Client.
// Guarded by the "phase2" build tag — enable once the Gitea adapter bridges these gaps:
//
// 1. PostReview signature mismatch:
// gitea.Client: PostReview(ctx, owner, repo, number, event, body string, comments []gitea.ReviewComment)
// vcs.Reviewer: PostReview(ctx, owner, repo, number, req vcs.ReviewRequest)
//
// 2. GetFileContent signature mismatch:
// gitea.Client: GetFileContent(ctx, owner, repo, filepath string) [no ref; uses default branch]
// vcs.FileReader: GetFileContent(ctx, owner, repo, path, ref string)
// (gitea.Client has GetFileContentRef for the ref variant)
//
// 3. ReviewComment type mismatch:
// gitea.ReviewComment uses NewPosition int64 (Gitea line-number convention)
// vcs.ReviewComment uses Position int (GitHub diff-position convention)
//
// The Gitea adapter (Phase 2) will wrap gitea.Client to bridge these gaps.
var _ vcs.Client = (*gitea.Client)(nil)