Compare commits

...

1 Commits

+53
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# Dev-Loop Session — 2026-05-15 14:28 UTC
**Cron ID:** 5342ac81-4bbc-4e4c-a123-347a7788d50c
**Session:** review-bot-dev-loop
**Objective:** Identify high-value improvement opportunities in steady-state project
## Current State
- **Project Status:** ✅ Steady state, all tests passing
- **Code Coverage:** 76.7% overall, 53.3% for cmd/review-bot
- **Recent Work:** v0.4.0 released, 4 PRs merged
- **Last Commit:** 6fa3cb9 — cycle status checkpoint
- **Working Tree:** Clean, no uncommitted changes
## Analysis
### High-Value Opportunities
1. **Unit Test Coverage Gaps (cmd/review-bot)**
- Main function: 31.7% coverage (target for improvement)
- Subprocess testing infrastructure exists (`TestMainSubprocess_*` pattern)
- Goal: Reach 80% coverage from 53.3%
- Impact: Better regression protection, easier refactoring
2. **Integration Test Framework**
- Existing: `integration_test.go` with full review flow tested
- Opportunity: Add edge case coverage (network timeouts, malformed inputs, rate limiting)
- Tools: Already uses subprocess pattern from validation tests
3. **Performance Profiling**
- doc-map filtering currently unoptimized
- No benchmarks in place for path-scoping logic
- Opportunity: Add pprof benchmarks, document baseline metrics
4. **Documentation Gaps**
- Composite action examples in README (incomplete)
- Multi-reviewer setup: partially documented
- Specialized review types: needs examples
## Recommendation
**Unit test improvements** for cmd/review-bot are the highest-value work:
- Lower risk than new features
- Builds on existing subprocess testing infrastructure
- Delivers immediate coverage gains
- Sets foundation for future refactoring
## Status: STEADY STATE — NO NEW ASSIGNMENTS
Repo is healthy and ready for next feature work. Standing by for Aaron's direction.
---
Generated: 2026-05-15 14:28 UTC | Cron: review-bot-dev-loop