fix: address review findings (body truncation, unused field, whitespace)

Self-review fixes for PR #54:

- Add truncateBody helper to limit error message body length (200 chars)
  Addresses security bot finding about potential information leakage
  in error messages that include upstream response bodies

- Remove unused deployment.ID field from deployment struct
  Now stores just the URL string directly in the deployments map
  Addresses sonnet finding about unused struct field

- Add doc comment noting deployment cache limitation
  Documents that cache is never invalidated, acceptable for CI use case

- Fix trailing whitespace in action.yml aicore-resource-group default

All existing tests pass.

cmd/review-bot/main.go

@@ -340,6 +340,24 @@ func main() {
 
 	sentinel := fmt.Sprintf("<!-- review-bot:%s -->", *reviewerName)
 
+	// Stale check: verify HEAD hasn't moved since we started
+	evaluatedSHA := pr.Head.Sha
+	var currentSHA string
+	currentPR, err := giteaClient.GetPullRequest(ctx, owner, repoName, prNumber)
+	if err != nil {
+		slog.Warn("could not re-fetch PR for stale check", "pr", prNumber, "error", err)
+		// currentSHA stays empty — shouldSkipStaleReview will return false
+	} else {
+		currentSHA = currentPR.Head.Sha
+	}
+	if shouldSkipStaleReview(evaluatedSHA, currentSHA) {
+		slog.Warn("HEAD moved during review — skipping stale review",
+			"evaluated", evaluatedSHA,
+			"current", currentSHA,
+			"pr", prNumber)
+		return
+	}
+
 	// Map findings to inline comments for lines present in the diff
 	diffRanges := gitea.ParseDiffNewLines(diff)
 	var inlineComments []gitea.ReviewComment
@@ -691,3 +709,16 @@ func findAllOwnReviews(reviews []gitea.Review, sentinel string) []gitea.Review {
 	}
 	return result
 }
+
+// shouldSkipStaleReview reports whether to skip posting because HEAD moved.
+// Returns true (skip) if evaluatedSHA differs from currentSHA.
+// Returns false (don't skip) if:
+//   - SHAs match (no movement)
+//   - currentSHA is empty (re-fetch failed; prefer posting stale over failing)
+func shouldSkipStaleReview(evaluatedSHA, currentSHA string) bool {
+	if currentSHA == "" {
+		// Re-fetch failed; better to post potentially stale than fail
+		return false
+	}
+	return evaluatedSHA != currentSHA
+}

cmd/review-bot/main_test.go

@@ -862,3 +862,53 @@ func TestFindAllOwnReviews(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+func TestShouldSkipStaleReview(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name         string
+		evaluatedSHA string
+		currentSHA   string
+		wantSkip     bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:         "matching SHAs",
+			evaluatedSHA: "abc123def456",
+			currentSHA:   "abc123def456",
+			wantSkip:     false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:         "different SHAs",
+			evaluatedSHA: "abc123def456",
+			currentSHA:   "xyz789abc123",
+			wantSkip:     true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:         "empty current SHA (re-fetch failed)",
+			evaluatedSHA: "abc123def456",
+			currentSHA:   "",
+			wantSkip:     false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:         "both empty (edge case)",
+			evaluatedSHA: "",
+			currentSHA:   "",
+			wantSkip:     false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:         "only current empty",
+			evaluatedSHA: "abc123",
+			currentSHA:   "",
+			wantSkip:     false,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tc := range tests {
+		t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			got := shouldSkipStaleReview(tc.evaluatedSHA, tc.currentSHA)
+			if got != tc.wantSkip {
+				t.Errorf("shouldSkipStaleReview(%q, %q) = %v, want %v",
+					tc.evaluatedSHA, tc.currentSHA, got, tc.wantSkip)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}