feat(gitea): pass commit_id explicitly in PostReview (#107)
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, ., rodin/security-patterns, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 57s

Add commitID parameter to gitea.Client.PostReview so the review is
anchored to the specific commit that was evaluated. The caller
(cmd/review-bot) already computes evaluatedSHA from pr.Head.Sha;
this wires it through to the Gitea API payload.

When commitID is empty, omitempty drops it from the JSON and Gitea
defaults to the current PR head (backward-compatible).

Closes #107
This commit is contained in:
claw
2026-05-13 10:29:05 -07:00
parent dc2e1ca5de
commit e59c2bc831
5 changed files with 40 additions and 12 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ func TestPostReview_WithComments(t *testing.T) {
{Path: "util.go", NewPosition: 10, Body: "[MINOR] Style issue"},
}
_, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "REQUEST_CHANGES", "summary", comments)
_, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "REQUEST_CHANGES", "summary", "", comments)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ func TestPostReview_NilComments(t *testing.T) {
defer server.Close()
client := NewClient(server.URL, "test-token")
_, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "APPROVED", "all good", nil)
_, err := client.PostReview(context.Background(), "owner", "repo", 1, "APPROVED", "all good", "", nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
}