fix: address review findings on budget system

- Account for truncation marker tokens when computing diff budget
  (prevents EstTokens exceeding model limit in edge cases)
- Rune-safe truncation for both UserMeta and Diff (no split multi-byte)
- Fix misleading comment (1000 chars → ~1000 tokens/4000 chars)
- Extract marker strings as constants
- Add unit tests for BuildSystemBase and BuildUserMeta

review/prompt_test.go

@@ -116,3 +116,43 @@ func TestBuildUserPrompt_WithoutFileContext(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Error("should not include file context section when empty")
 	}
 }
+
+
+func TestBuildSystemBase(t *testing.T) {
+	result := BuildSystemBase()
+	if result == "" {
+		t.Fatal("BuildSystemBase returned empty string")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "expert code reviewer") {
+		t.Error("expected reviewer role in system base")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "REQUEST_CHANGES") {
+		t.Error("expected verdict format in system base")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "JSON") {
+		t.Error("expected JSON output instruction in system base")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestBuildUserMeta(t *testing.T) {
+	result := BuildUserMeta("Fix bug", "Some description", true, "all checks passed")
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "Fix bug") {
+		t.Error("expected title in user meta")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "Some description") {
+		t.Error("expected description in user meta")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "PASSED") {
+		t.Error("expected CI PASSED status")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestBuildUserMeta_CIFailed(t *testing.T) {
+	result := BuildUserMeta("Title", "", false, "test job failed")
+	if !strings.Contains(result, "FAILED") {
+		t.Error("expected CI FAILED status")
+	}
+	if strings.Contains(result, "Description") {
+		t.Error("expected no description section when empty")
+	}
+}