fix: address review feedback - eliminate type assertion via ReviewSuperseder interface
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, ., rodin/security-patterns, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m51s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
PR Ready Gate / clear-labels (pull_request) Successful in 2s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / review (anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet, sonnet, SONNET_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / review (gpt-5, security, ., rodin/security-patterns, SECURITY_REVIEW.md, SECURITY_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 1m51s
CI / review (gpt-5, gpt, GPT_REVIEW_TOKEN) (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
- Introduce vcs.VCSProvider typed constant (replaces plain string provider) - Introduce vcs.ReviewSuperseder optional interface for supersede logic - Implement SupersedeReviews on gitea.Adapter (edit + resolve) and github.Client (dismiss) - Remove concrete type assertion client.(*gitea.Adapter) from main - Remove redundant baseURL fallback for github (NewClient defaults it) - Condense --gitea-url alias comment block - Fix fetchPatterns comment (empty paths are skipped, not fetched) - Add default panic to VCS client init switch Addresses: #19607, #19608, #19609, #19610, #19621, #19622, #19623
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ package gitea
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"log/slog"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
|
||||
"gitea.weiker.me/rodin/review-bot/vcs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -237,3 +239,76 @@ func (a *Adapter) GetAuthenticatedUser(ctx context.Context) (string, error) {
|
||||
func (a *Adapter) RequestReviewerSelf(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int, user string) error {
|
||||
return a.client.RequestReviewer(ctx, owner, repo, number, user)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Compile-time interface conformance assertion for ReviewSuperseder.
|
||||
var _ vcs.ReviewSuperseder = (*Adapter)(nil)
|
||||
|
||||
// SupersedeReviews marks prior reviews as superseded by editing their body with a
|
||||
// link to the new review and resolving their inline comments. This is Gitea-specific
|
||||
// behavior that has no GitHub equivalent (GitHub uses DismissReview instead).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// baseURL is the Gitea instance URL used to construct review permalink URLs.
|
||||
// sentinel is the HTML comment sentinel that identifies reviews belonging to this reviewer.
|
||||
func (a *Adapter) SupersedeReviews(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, prNumber int, oldReviews []vcs.Review, newReviewID int64, baseURL, sentinel string) error {
|
||||
// Validate baseURL scheme before embedding in Markdown link (defense-in-depth).
|
||||
if !strings.HasPrefix(baseURL, "http://") && !strings.HasPrefix(baseURL, "https://") {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("SupersedeReviews: baseURL must have http or https scheme, got %q", baseURL)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
underlying := a.client
|
||||
|
||||
newReviewURL := fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s/%s/pulls/%d#pullrequestreview-%d",
|
||||
strings.TrimRight(baseURL, "/"), owner, repo, prNumber, newReviewID)
|
||||
|
||||
for _, oldReview := range oldReviews {
|
||||
cid, err := underlying.GetTimelineReviewCommentIDForReview(ctx, owner, repo, prNumber, oldReview.ID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
slog.Warn("could not find comment ID for old review", "review_id", oldReview.ID, "error", err)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
supersededBody := buildSupersededBody(oldReview.Body, oldReview.CommitID, newReviewURL, sentinel)
|
||||
if err := underlying.EditComment(ctx, owner, repo, cid, supersededBody); err != nil {
|
||||
slog.Warn("could not mark old review as superseded", "review_id", oldReview.ID, "error", err)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Resolve old review's inline comments
|
||||
oldComments, err := underlying.ListReviewComments(ctx, owner, repo, prNumber, oldReview.ID)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
slog.Warn("could not list old review comments for resolution", "review_id", oldReview.ID, "error", err)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, c := range oldComments {
|
||||
if c.ID == 0 {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ = underlying.ResolveComment(ctx, owner, repo, c.ID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// buildSupersededBody creates the body for a superseded review: struck-through banner
|
||||
// with collapsed original content and the commit it was evaluated against.
|
||||
func buildSupersededBody(originalBody, commitSHA, newReviewURL, sentinel string) string {
|
||||
shortSHA := commitSHA
|
||||
if len(shortSHA) > 8 {
|
||||
shortSHA = shortSHA[:8]
|
||||
}
|
||||
var sb strings.Builder
|
||||
sb.WriteString("~~Original review~~\n\n")
|
||||
sb.WriteString("**Superseded** \u2014 [see current review](")
|
||||
sb.WriteString(newReviewURL)
|
||||
sb.WriteString(") for up-to-date findings.\n\n")
|
||||
if shortSHA != "" {
|
||||
sb.WriteString("<details><summary>Previous findings (commit ")
|
||||
sb.WriteString(shortSHA)
|
||||
sb.WriteString(")</summary>\n\n")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
sb.WriteString("<details><summary>Previous findings</summary>\n\n")
|
||||
}
|
||||
sb.WriteString(originalBody)
|
||||
sb.WriteString("\n\n</details>\n\n")
|
||||
sb.WriteString(sentinel)
|
||||
return sb.String()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
package gitea
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func TestBuildSupersededBody(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
original := "# Review\n\nLooks good.\n\n<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->"
|
||||
sentinel := "<!-- review-bot:sonnet -->"
|
||||
newURL := "https://gitea.example.com/owner/repo/pulls/1#pullrequestreview-99"
|
||||
|
||||
result := buildSupersededBody(original, "abcdef1234567890", newURL, sentinel)
|
||||
|
||||
// Should contain the struck-through banner
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "~~Original review~~") {
|
||||
t.Error("missing struck-through banner")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should contain superseded notice with link
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "**Superseded**") {
|
||||
t.Error("missing superseded notice")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "[see current review]("+newURL+")") {
|
||||
t.Error("missing link to new review")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should contain collapsed original
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "<details>") {
|
||||
t.Error("missing details/collapse")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should contain short commit SHA
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "abcdef12") {
|
||||
t.Error("missing short SHA")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should NOT contain full SHA in summary (it's truncated to 8)
|
||||
if strings.Contains(result, "abcdef1234567890") {
|
||||
t.Error("should truncate SHA to 8 chars")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should contain the original body inside details
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, original) {
|
||||
t.Error("original body not preserved in collapsed section")
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Should end with sentinel
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, sentinel) {
|
||||
t.Error("missing sentinel")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestBuildSupersededBodyShortSHA(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Short SHA should pass through without panic
|
||||
result := buildSupersededBody("body", "abc", "https://example.com/review", "<!-- review-bot:x -->")
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(result, "abc") {
|
||||
t.Error("short SHA not preserved")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user