feat(persona): add role-based review personas

Add persona system for specialized review roles. Each persona defines:
- A specific review focus (security, architecture, documentation)
- Custom system prompt additions
- Personality/tone adjustments

Built-in personas: security, architect, docs
Custom personas: load from JSON via persona-file flag

Includes workspace validation to prevent path traversal attacks.

Closes #51

review/formatter.go

@@ -7,10 +7,37 @@ import (
 
 // FormatMarkdown formats a ReviewResult into the markdown body for a Gitea review.
 func FormatMarkdown(result *ReviewResult, reviewerName string) string {
+	return FormatMarkdownWithDisplay(result, reviewerName, reviewerName)
+}
+
+// GiteaEvent converts the verdict to the Gitea API event string.
+func GiteaEvent(verdict string) string {
+	switch verdict {
+	case "APPROVE":
+		return "APPROVED"
+	case "REQUEST_CHANGES":
+		return "REQUEST_CHANGES"
+	default:
+		return "COMMENT"
+	}
+}
+
+// FormatMarkdownWithDisplay formats a ReviewResult with separate display name and sentinel name.
+// Note: displayName is not HTML-escaped as Gitea sanitizes rendered Markdown.
+// Persona display names are controlled by repo owners (trusted input).
+// displayName is used for the header title, sentinelName is used for the cleanup sentinel.
+// If displayName is empty, sentinelName is used for both.
+func FormatMarkdownWithDisplay(result *ReviewResult, displayName, sentinelName string) string {
 	var sb strings.Builder
 
-	if reviewerName != "" {
-		title := strings.ToUpper(reviewerName[:1]) + reviewerName[1:]
+	// Use display name for header, or fall back to sentinel name
+	headerName := displayName
+	if headerName == "" {
+		headerName = sentinelName
+	}
+
+	if headerName != "" {
+		title := strings.ToUpper(headerName[:1]) + headerName[1:]
 		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("# %s Review\n\n", title))
 	}
 
@@ -33,23 +60,11 @@ func FormatMarkdown(result *ReviewResult, reviewerName string) string {
 	sb.WriteString("## Recommendation\n\n")
 	sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("**%s** — %s\n", result.Verdict, result.Recommendation))
 
-	if reviewerName != "" {
-		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n---\n*Review by %s*\n", reviewerName))
+	if sentinelName != "" {
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n---\n*Review by %s*\n", headerName))
 		// Hidden sentinel for identifying this bot's reviews during cleanup
-		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n<!-- review-bot:%s -->\n", reviewerName))
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n<!-- review-bot:%s -->\n", sentinelName))
 	}
 
 	return sb.String()
 }
-
-// GiteaEvent converts the verdict to the Gitea API event string.
-func GiteaEvent(verdict string) string {
-	switch verdict {
-	case "APPROVE":
-		return "APPROVED"
-	case "REQUEST_CHANGES":
-		return "REQUEST_CHANGES"
-	default:
-		return "COMMENT"
-	}
-}

review/formatter_test.go

@@ -159,3 +159,58 @@ func TestFormatMarkdown_RoleTitle(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Error("should not contain role title header when reviewer name is empty")
 	}
 }
+
+func TestFormatMarkdownWithDisplay(t *testing.T) {
+	result := &ReviewResult{
+		Verdict:        "APPROVE",
+		Summary:        "Test summary",
+		Findings:       nil,
+		Recommendation: "Test recommendation",
+	}
+
+	t.Run("with display name", func(t *testing.T) {
+		body := FormatMarkdownWithDisplay(result, "Security Specialist", "security")
+
+		// Header should use display name
+		if !strings.Contains(body, "# Security Specialist Review") {
+			t.Error("header should use display name")
+		}
+
+		// Sentinel should use sentinel name
+		if !strings.Contains(body, "<!-- review-bot:security -->") {
+			t.Error("sentinel should use sentinel name")
+		}
+
+		// Footer "Review by" should use display name
+		if !strings.Contains(body, "*Review by Security Specialist*") {
+			t.Error("footer should use display name")
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("without display name", func(t *testing.T) {
+		body := FormatMarkdownWithDisplay(result, "", "reviewer")
+
+		// Should fall back to sentinel name for header
+		if !strings.Contains(body, "# Reviewer Review") {
+			t.Error("header should fall back to sentinel name")
+		}
+
+		if !strings.Contains(body, "<!-- review-bot:reviewer -->") {
+			t.Error("sentinel should use sentinel name")
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("empty both names", func(t *testing.T) {
+		body := FormatMarkdownWithDisplay(result, "", "")
+
+		// Should not have header
+		if strings.Contains(body, "# ") && strings.Contains(body, " Review") {
+			t.Error("should not have header when both names empty")
+		}
+
+		// Should not have sentinel
+		if strings.Contains(body, "<!-- review-bot:") {
+			t.Error("should not have sentinel when sentinel name empty")
+		}
+	})
+}

review/persona.go

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+package review
+
+import (
+	"embed"
+	"encoding/json"
+	"fmt"
+	"os"
+	"path/filepath"
+	"strings"
+
+	"github.com/goccy/go-yaml"
+)
+
+//go:embed personas/*.yaml
+var embeddedPersonas embed.FS
+
+// Persona defines a specialized review role with focused expertise.
+type Persona struct {
+	Name         string   `json:"name" yaml:"name"`
+	DisplayName  string   `json:"display_name" yaml:"display_name"`
+	ModelPref    string   `json:"model_preference,omitempty" yaml:"model_preference,omitempty"`
+	Identity     string   `json:"identity" yaml:"identity"`
+	Focus        []string `json:"focus" yaml:"focus"`
+	Ignore       []string `json:"ignore" yaml:"ignore"`
+	Severity     Severity `json:"severity" yaml:"severity"`
+	OutputFormat string   `json:"output_format,omitempty" yaml:"output_format,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// Severity defines what constitutes each severity level for this persona.
+// These are prompt guidance for the LLM, not output format changes.
+type Severity struct {
+	Major string `json:"major" yaml:"major"`
+	Minor string `json:"minor" yaml:"minor"`
+	Nit   string `json:"nit" yaml:"nit"`
+}
+
+// LoadPersona loads a persona from a file path.
+// Supports both YAML (.yaml, .yml) and JSON (.json) formats.
+func LoadPersona(path string) (*Persona, error) {
+	data, err := os.ReadFile(path)
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("read persona file %s: %w", path, err)
+	}
+	return parsePersona(data, path)
+}
+
+// LoadBuiltinPersona loads a built-in persona by name.
+// Returns an error if the persona doesn't exist.
+func LoadBuiltinPersona(name string) (*Persona, error) {
+	filename := name + ".yaml"
+	data, err := embeddedPersonas.ReadFile("personas/" + filename) // embed.FS paths use forward slashes per io/fs spec
+	if err != nil {
+		available := ListBuiltinPersonas()
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("unknown built-in persona %q (available: %s)", name, strings.Join(available, ", "))
+	}
+	return parsePersona(data, "builtin:"+name)
+}
+
+// ListBuiltinPersonas returns the names of all built-in personas.
+func ListBuiltinPersonas() []string {
+	entries, err := embeddedPersonas.ReadDir("personas")
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil
+	}
+	var names []string
+	for _, e := range entries {
+		if e.IsDir() {
+			continue
+		}
+		name := e.Name()
+		if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".yaml") {
+			names = append(names, strings.TrimSuffix(name, ".yaml"))
+		} else if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".yml") {
+			names = append(names, strings.TrimSuffix(name, ".yml"))
+		}
+	}
+	return names
+}
+
+func parsePersona(data []byte, source string) (*Persona, error) {
+	var p Persona
+	
+	// Determine format by extension or try YAML first (it's a superset of JSON)
+	ext := strings.ToLower(filepath.Ext(source))
+	if ext == ".json" {
+		if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &p); err != nil {
+			return nil, fmt.Errorf("parse persona %s: %w", source, err)
+		}
+	} else {
+		// YAML (also handles .yaml, .yml, and builtin: prefix)
+		if err := yaml.Unmarshal(data, &p); err != nil {
+			return nil, fmt.Errorf("parse persona %s: %w", source, err)
+		}
+	}
+	
+	if err := validatePersona(&p, source); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+	return &p, nil
+}
+
+func validatePersona(p *Persona, source string) error {
+	if p.Name == "" {
+		return fmt.Errorf("persona %s: name is required", source)
+	}
+	if p.Identity == "" {
+		return fmt.Errorf("persona %s: identity is required", source)
+	}
+	// DisplayName defaults to Name if not set
+	if p.DisplayName == "" {
+		p.DisplayName = p.Name
+	}
+	return nil
+}

review/persona_prompt.go

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+package review
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"strings"
+)
+
+// BuildPersonaSystemPrompt constructs a system prompt from a persona definition.
+// This replaces BuildSystemBase when a persona is provided.
+func BuildPersonaSystemPrompt(p *Persona) string {
+	var sb strings.Builder
+
+	// Identity section
+	sb.WriteString(p.Identity)
+	sb.WriteString("\n\n")
+
+	// Focus section
+	if len(p.Focus) > 0 {
+		sb.WriteString("## Focus Areas\n\n")
+		sb.WriteString("Concentrate your review on:\n")
+		for _, f := range p.Focus {
+			sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("- %s\n", f))
+		}
+		sb.WriteString("\n")
+	}
+
+	// Ignore section
+	if len(p.Ignore) > 0 {
+		sb.WriteString("## Explicitly Out of Scope\n\n")
+		sb.WriteString("Do NOT comment on:\n")
+		for _, i := range p.Ignore {
+			sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("- %s\n", i))
+		}
+		sb.WriteString("\n")
+	}
+
+	// Severity calibration
+	if p.Severity.Major != "" || p.Severity.Minor != "" || p.Severity.Nit != "" {
+		sb.WriteString("## Severity Calibration\n\n")
+		sb.WriteString("Use these severity definitions for YOUR domain:\n")
+		if p.Severity.Major != "" {
+			sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("- **MAJOR**: %s\n", p.Severity.Major))
+		}
+		if p.Severity.Minor != "" {
+			sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("- **MINOR**: %s\n", p.Severity.Minor))
+		}
+		if p.Severity.Nit != "" {
+			sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("- **NIT**: %s\n", p.Severity.Nit))
+		}
+		sb.WriteString("\n")
+	}
+
+	// Output format instructions (shared schema from prompt.go)
+	sb.WriteString("## Review Instructions\n\n")
+	sb.WriteString("CONTEXT:\n")
+	sb.WriteString("- You will receive the full content of modified files for reference, followed by the diff showing what changed.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("- The diff shows ONLY what was added/removed. The full file content provides complete context.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("- Focus your review on the CHANGES (the diff), using the full files for context.\n\n")
+	sb.WriteString("Your task:\n")
+	sb.WriteString("1. Review the diff for issues within YOUR focus areas only.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("2. Consider the CI status — if CI has failed, that is an automatic REQUEST_CHANGES regardless of code quality.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("3. Output your review as structured JSON (and ONLY JSON, no markdown fences or other text).\n\n")
+	sb.WriteString("Output format:\n")
+	sb.WriteString(outputSchemaJSON)
+	sb.WriteString("\n\n")
+	sb.WriteString(verdictRules)
+	sb.WriteString("\n- Only report findings within your focus areas. Ignore everything else.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("- Line numbers should reference the new file line numbers from the diff headers.\n")
+	sb.WriteString("- If the diff has no changes relevant to your focus areas, APPROVE with no findings.\n")
+
+	// Custom output format if provided
+	if p.OutputFormat != "" {
+		sb.WriteString("\n\n## Additional Output Guidelines\n\n")
+		sb.WriteString(p.OutputFormat)
+	}
+
+	return sb.String()
+}
+
+// BuildSystemPromptWithPersona constructs the full system prompt, using either
+// a persona or the default generic prompt. This is a convenience wrapper that
+// combines BuildPersonaSystemPrompt (or BuildSystemBase) with patterns and conventions.
+// It is exported for use by callers who want one-shot prompt assembly.
+func BuildSystemPromptWithPersona(persona *Persona, conventions, patterns string) string {
+	var base string
+	if persona != nil {
+		base = BuildPersonaSystemPrompt(persona)
+	} else {
+		base = BuildSystemBase()
+	}
+
+	var sb strings.Builder
+	sb.WriteString(base)
+
+	if patterns != "" {
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n\n## Language Patterns & Idioms\n\nUse the following patterns as review criteria. Code that violates these established patterns is a finding:\n\n%s\n", patterns))
+	}
+
+	if conventions != "" {
+		sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("\n\n## Repository Conventions\n\nThe repository has the following coding conventions that must be respected:\n\n%s\n", conventions))
+	}
+
+	return sb.String()
+}

review/persona_prompt_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+package review
+
+import (
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+)
+
+func TestBuildPersonaSystemPrompt(t *testing.T) {
+	p := &Persona{
+		Name:        "security",
+		DisplayName: "Security Specialist",
+		Identity:    "You are a security specialist.",
+		Focus:       []string{"injection attacks", "auth bypass"},
+		Ignore:      []string{"code style", "performance"},
+		Severity: Severity{
+			Major: "exploitable vulnerabilities",
+			Minor: "defense in depth",
+			Nit:   "theoretical risks",
+		},
+	}
+
+	prompt := BuildPersonaSystemPrompt(p)
+
+	// Check identity is included
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "You are a security specialist.") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain identity")
+	}
+
+	// Check focus areas
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "Focus Areas") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain Focus Areas section")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "injection attacks") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain focus item")
+	}
+
+	// Check ignore section
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "Out of Scope") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain Out of Scope section")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "code style") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain ignore item")
+	}
+
+	// Check severity calibration
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "Severity Calibration") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain Severity Calibration section")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "exploitable vulnerabilities") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain major severity definition")
+	}
+
+	// Check JSON output format is included
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, `"verdict"`) {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain JSON output format")
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "APPROVE") {
+		t.Error("prompt should mention APPROVE verdict")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestBuildPersonaSystemPromptMinimal(t *testing.T) {
+	// Minimal persona with only required fields
+	p := &Persona{
+		Name:     "minimal",
+		Identity: "You are a minimal reviewer.",
+	}
+
+	prompt := BuildPersonaSystemPrompt(p)
+
+	// Should still work without optional fields
+	if !strings.Contains(prompt, "You are a minimal reviewer.") {
+		t.Error("prompt should contain identity")
+	}
+
+	// Should not have empty sections
+	if strings.Contains(prompt, "Focus Areas") && !strings.Contains(prompt, "Concentrate your review on:") {
+		t.Error("should not have Focus Areas header without content")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestBuildSystemPromptWithPersona(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Run("with persona", func(t *testing.T) {
+		p := &Persona{
+			Name:     "test",
+			Identity: "Test persona identity.",
+			Focus:    []string{"testing"},
+		}
+
+		prompt := BuildSystemPromptWithPersona(p, "test conventions", "test patterns")
+
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, "Test persona identity.") {
+			t.Error("should contain persona identity")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, "test conventions") {
+			t.Error("should contain conventions")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, "test patterns") {
+			t.Error("should contain patterns")
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("without persona", func(t *testing.T) {
+		prompt := BuildSystemPromptWithPersona(nil, "test conventions", "test patterns")
+
+		// Should use default system base
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, "expert code reviewer") {
+			t.Error("should contain default system base when no persona")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, "test conventions") {
+			t.Error("should contain conventions")
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("empty conventions and patterns", func(t *testing.T) {
+		p := &Persona{
+			Name:     "test",
+			Identity: "Test identity.",
+		}
+
+		prompt := BuildSystemPromptWithPersona(p, "", "")
+
+		if strings.Contains(prompt, "Language Patterns") {
+			t.Error("should not contain patterns section when empty")
+		}
+		if strings.Contains(prompt, "Repository Conventions") {
+			t.Error("should not contain conventions section when empty")
+		}
+	})
+}
+
+func TestPersonaPromptContainsOutputRules(t *testing.T) {
+	p := &Persona{
+		Name:     "test",
+		Identity: "Test.",
+	}
+
+	prompt := BuildPersonaSystemPrompt(p)
+
+	// Must contain the critical output rules
+	requiredStrings := []string{
+		"APPROVE",
+		"REQUEST_CHANGES",
+		"MAJOR",
+		"MINOR",
+		"NIT",
+		"verdict",
+		"findings",
+		"CI",
+	}
+
+	for _, s := range requiredStrings {
+		if !strings.Contains(prompt, s) {
+			t.Errorf("prompt should contain %q", s)
+		}
+	}
+}

review/persona_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+package review
+
+import (
+	"os"
+	"path/filepath"
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+)
+
+func TestLoadBuiltinPersona(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name        string
+		personaName string
+		wantErr     bool
+		wantDisplay string
+	}{
+		{
+			name:        "security persona",
+			personaName: "security",
+			wantErr:     false,
+			wantDisplay: "Security Specialist",
+		},
+		{
+			name:        "architect persona",
+			personaName: "architect",
+			wantErr:     false,
+			wantDisplay: "Software Architect",
+		},
+		{
+			name:        "docs persona",
+			personaName: "docs",
+			wantErr:     false,
+			wantDisplay: "Documentation Reviewer",
+		},
+		{
+			name:        "unknown persona",
+			personaName: "nonexistent",
+			wantErr:     true,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			p, err := LoadBuiltinPersona(tt.personaName)
+			if tt.wantErr {
+				if err == nil {
+					t.Error("expected error, got nil")
+				}
+				return
+			}
+			if err != nil {
+				t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
+			}
+			if p.Name != tt.personaName {
+				t.Errorf("Name = %q, want %q", p.Name, tt.personaName)
+			}
+			if p.DisplayName != tt.wantDisplay {
+				t.Errorf("DisplayName = %q, want %q", p.DisplayName, tt.wantDisplay)
+			}
+			if p.Identity == "" {
+				t.Error("Identity should not be empty")
+			}
+			if len(p.Focus) == 0 {
+				t.Error("Focus should not be empty")
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestListBuiltinPersonas(t *testing.T) {
+	names := ListBuiltinPersonas()
+	if len(names) == 0 {
+		t.Fatal("expected at least one built-in persona")
+	}
+
+	// Check for expected personas
+	expected := map[string]bool{"security": false, "architect": false, "docs": false}
+	for _, name := range names {
+		if _, ok := expected[name]; ok {
+			expected[name] = true
+		}
+	}
+	for name, found := range expected {
+		if !found {
+			t.Errorf("expected built-in persona %q not found", name)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLoadPersonaFromYAMLFile(t *testing.T) {
+	dir := t.TempDir()
+	path := filepath.Join(dir, "test.yaml")
+
+	content := `
+name: test
+display_name: Test Persona
+identity: |
+  You are a test persona.
+  Multi-line identity works.
+focus:
+  - testing
+  - validation
+ignore:
+  - nothing
+severity:
+  major: Big problems
+  minor: Small problems
+  nit: Tiny problems
+`
+
+	if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte(content), 0644); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("failed to write test file: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	p, err := LoadPersona(path)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("LoadPersona failed: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	if p.Name != "test" {
+		t.Errorf("Name = %q, want %q", p.Name, "test")
+	}
+	if p.DisplayName != "Test Persona" {
+		t.Errorf("DisplayName = %q, want %q", p.DisplayName, "Test Persona")
+	}
+	if len(p.Focus) != 2 {
+		t.Errorf("Focus len = %d, want 2", len(p.Focus))
+	}
+	if !strings.Contains(p.Identity, "Multi-line") {
+		t.Error("Identity should contain multi-line content")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLoadPersonaFromJSONFile(t *testing.T) {
+	dir := t.TempDir()
+	path := filepath.Join(dir, "test.json")
+
+	content := `{
+		"name": "test",
+		"display_name": "Test Persona",
+		"identity": "You are a test persona.",
+		"focus": ["testing"],
+		"ignore": ["nothing"],
+		"severity": {
+			"major": "Big problems",
+			"minor": "Small problems",
+			"nit": "Tiny problems"
+		}
+	}`
+
+	if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte(content), 0644); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("failed to write test file: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	p, err := LoadPersona(path)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("LoadPersona failed: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	if p.Name != "test" {
+		t.Errorf("Name = %q, want %q", p.Name, "test")
+	}
+	if p.DisplayName != "Test Persona" {
+		t.Errorf("DisplayName = %q, want %q", p.DisplayName, "Test Persona")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLoadPersonaValidation(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name    string
+		yaml    string
+		wantErr string
+	}{
+		{
+			name:    "missing name",
+			yaml:    "identity: test",
+			wantErr: "name is required",
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "missing identity",
+			yaml:    "name: test",
+			wantErr: "identity is required",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "display_name defaults to name",
+			yaml: "name: test\nidentity: test identity",
+			// No error expected - should succeed
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			dir := t.TempDir()
+			path := filepath.Join(dir, "test.yaml")
+			if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte(tt.yaml), 0644); err != nil {
+				t.Fatalf("failed to write test file: %v", err)
+			}
+
+			p, err := LoadPersona(path)
+			if tt.wantErr != "" {
+				if err == nil {
+					t.Errorf("expected error containing %q, got nil", tt.wantErr)
+					return
+				}
+				if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), tt.wantErr) {
+					t.Errorf("error = %q, want containing %q", err.Error(), tt.wantErr)
+				}
+				return
+			}
+			if err != nil {
+				t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
+			}
+			// Check display_name defaulting
+			if p.DisplayName == "" {
+				t.Error("DisplayName should default to Name")
+			}
+			if p.DisplayName != p.Name {
+				t.Errorf("DisplayName should default to Name, got %q", p.DisplayName)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLoadPersonaFileNotFound(t *testing.T) {
+	_, err := LoadPersona("/nonexistent/path/persona.yaml")
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Error("expected error for nonexistent file")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestLoadPersonaInvalidYAML(t *testing.T) {
+	dir := t.TempDir()
+	path := filepath.Join(dir, "invalid.yaml")
+	if err := os.WriteFile(path, []byte("not: valid: yaml: here"), 0644); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("failed to write test file: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	_, err := LoadPersona(path)
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Error("expected error for invalid YAML")
+	}
+}

review/personas/architect.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+name: architect
+display_name: Software Architect
+
+identity: |
+  You are a software architect reviewing code for design quality.
+  
+  Your expertise:
+  - Design patterns and anti-patterns
+  - Code organization and module boundaries
+  - API design and contracts
+  - Testability and dependency injection
+  - Consistency with existing architecture
+  - Technical debt identification
+
+focus:
+  - Design pattern violations or misuse
+  - Module boundary violations (inappropriate coupling)
+  - API design issues (unclear contracts, leaky abstractions)
+  - Testability problems (hidden dependencies, god objects)
+  - Inconsistency with existing codebase patterns
+  - Unnecessary complexity or over-engineering
+  - Missing abstractions or premature abstraction
+
+ignore:
+  - Security vulnerabilities (security persona handles these)
+  - Performance micro-optimizations
+  - Code style and formatting
+  - Documentation typos
+  - Test implementation details
+
+severity:
+  major: "Architectural violations that will cause maintenance problems or make the codebase harder to evolve"
+  minor: "Design issues that reduce clarity or testability but don't block progress"
+  nit: "Minor pattern deviations or style preferences"

review/personas/docs.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+name: docs
+display_name: Documentation Reviewer
+
+identity: |
+  You are a documentation specialist reviewing code for clarity and documentation quality.
+  
+  Your expertise:
+  - API documentation and examples
+  - Code comments and their accuracy
+  - Error message clarity
+  - README and guide quality
+  - Naming clarity and self-documenting code
+
+focus:
+  - Missing or outdated documentation
+  - Unclear or misleading comments
+  - Poor error messages (cryptic, unhelpful, missing context)
+  - Confusing naming (functions, variables, types)
+  - Missing examples for complex APIs
+  - Inconsistent terminology
+  - Documentation that contradicts the code
+
+ignore:
+  - Security vulnerabilities
+  - Performance issues
+  - Design patterns
+  - Test coverage
+  - Code style (unless it affects readability)
+
+severity:
+  major: "Documentation that actively misleads or missing docs for critical functionality"
+  minor: "Unclear documentation or poor error messages that will confuse users"
+  nit: "Minor clarity improvements or typo fixes"

review/personas/security.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+name: security
+display_name: Security Specialist
+
+identity: |
+  You are a security specialist reviewing code for vulnerabilities.
+  
+  Your expertise:
+  - OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
+  - Injection attacks (SQL, command, path traversal, template)
+  - Authentication and authorization patterns
+  - Secrets management and exposure risks
+  - Race conditions with security implications
+  - Event sourcing attack vectors (replay attacks, event injection)
+
+focus:
+  - Injection attacks (SQL, command, path traversal, template injection)
+  - Authentication and authorization gaps or bypasses
+  - Secrets exposure (hardcoded credentials, tokens in logs, config leaks)
+  - Input validation failures (unsanitized input, unsafe deserialization)
+  - Race conditions that could be exploited
+  - Cryptographic weaknesses (weak algorithms, improper key handling)
+  - Information disclosure through error messages or logs
+
+ignore:
+  - Code style and naming conventions
+  - Performance optimizations (unless security-related)
+  - Documentation quality
+  - General code quality or readability
+  - Test coverage
+
+severity:
+  major: "Exploitable vulnerabilities: auth bypass, injection, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, RCE"
+  minor: "Defense-in-depth issues: missing rate limiting, verbose errors, weak input validation"
+  nit: "Theoretical risks with low exploitability or impact"

review/prompt.go

@@ -7,6 +7,28 @@ import (
 	"strings"
 )
 
+// outputSchemaJSON is the shared JSON output format specification used by both
+// the generic reviewer and persona-based reviewers.
+const outputSchemaJSON = `{
+  "verdict": "APPROVE" or "REQUEST_CHANGES",
+  "summary": "Brief overall assessment (1-3 sentences)",
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "severity": "MAJOR" or "MINOR" or "NIT",
+      "file": "path/to/file",
+      "line": <line number from the diff>,
+      "finding": "Description of the issue"
+    }
+  ],
+  "recommendation": "Full recommendation text explaining your verdict"
+}`
+
+// verdictRules is the shared verdict determination rules.
+const verdictRules = `Rules:
+- If there are any MAJOR findings → verdict must be REQUEST_CHANGES
+- If there are no MAJOR findings → verdict should be APPROVE
+- If CI has failed → verdict must be REQUEST_CHANGES with a finding noting the CI failure`
+
 // BuildSystemBase returns the core system prompt instructions without
 // patterns or conventions. Used by the budget package to separate
 // trimmable from non-trimmable content.
@@ -23,24 +45,10 @@ func BuildSystemBase() string {
 	sb.WriteString("2. Consider the CI status — if CI has failed, that is an automatic REQUEST_CHANGES regardless of code quality.\n")
 	sb.WriteString("3. Output your review as structured JSON (and ONLY JSON, no markdown fences or other text).\n\n")
 	sb.WriteString("Output format:\n")
-	sb.WriteString("{\n")
-	sb.WriteString("  \"verdict\": \"APPROVE\" or \"REQUEST_CHANGES\",\n")
-	sb.WriteString("  \"summary\": \"Brief overall assessment (1-3 sentences)\",\n")
-	sb.WriteString("  \"findings\": [\n")
-	sb.WriteString("    {\n")
-	sb.WriteString("      \"severity\": \"MAJOR\" or \"MINOR\" or \"NIT\",\n")
-	sb.WriteString("      \"file\": \"path/to/file\",\n")
-	sb.WriteString("      \"line\": <line number from the diff>,\n")
-	sb.WriteString("      \"finding\": \"Description of the issue\"\n")
-	sb.WriteString("    }\n")
-	sb.WriteString("  ],\n")
-	sb.WriteString("  \"recommendation\": \"Full recommendation text explaining your verdict\"\n")
-	sb.WriteString("}\n\n")
-	sb.WriteString("Rules:\n")
-	sb.WriteString("- If there are any MAJOR findings → verdict must be REQUEST_CHANGES\n")
-	sb.WriteString("- If there are no MAJOR findings → verdict should be APPROVE\n")
-	sb.WriteString("- If CI has failed → verdict must be REQUEST_CHANGES with a finding noting the CI failure\n")
-	sb.WriteString("- Be thorough but fair. Don't nitpick style unless it impacts readability significantly.\n")
+	sb.WriteString(outputSchemaJSON)
+	sb.WriteString("\n\n")
+	sb.WriteString(verdictRules)
+	sb.WriteString("\n- Be thorough but fair. Don't nitpick style unless it impacts readability significantly.\n")
 	sb.WriteString("- Line numbers should reference the new file line numbers from the diff headers.\n")
 	sb.WriteString("- If the diff is empty or trivial (only formatting/whitespace), APPROVE with no findings.\n")