Files

T

aweiker a7a853bb43 docs: add when-not to structs + testing-advanced + api-conventions

2026-04-30 13:24:01 +00:00

25 KiB

Raw Blame History

Advanced Go Testing Patterns

Patterns extracted from the Go standard library (src/net/http/, src/encoding/json/, src/testing/) and Kubernetes source code.

1. Table-Driven Tests

The canonical Go test style. Every Go stdlib test file uses this pattern.

Pattern Name: Anonymous Struct Test Table

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/header_test.go lines 17-108

What they do: Define test cases as a slice of anonymous structs, iterate with a range loop.

Why: Eliminates repetition, makes adding cases trivial, keeps the assertion logic in one place. Every test case gets the same verification path — no "special" cases hidden in different code paths.

When to Use

Triggers:

You're testing a function with many input/output combinations
You're copy-pasting test functions that differ by one or two values
Adding a new test case requires duplicating 10+ lines of setup/assertion code

Example — before:

func TestParseSize(t *testing.T) {
    result1, err1 := ParseSize("10MB")
    if err1 != nil || result1 != 10_000_000 { t.Error("10MB failed") }

    result2, err2 := ParseSize("1GB")
    if err2 != nil || result2 != 1_000_000_000 { t.Error("1GB failed") }

    result3, err3 := ParseSize("invalid")
    if err3 == nil { t.Error("invalid should fail") }
    // ... 20 more copy-pasted blocks
}

Example — after:

func TestParseSize(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        input   string
        want    int64
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {"10MB", 10_000_000, false},
        {"1GB", 1_000_000_000, false},
        {"invalid", 0, true},
        {"0B", 0, false},
    }
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.input, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := ParseSize(tt.input)
            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
                t.Fatalf("ParseSize(%q) error = %v, wantErr %v", tt.input, err, tt.wantErr)
            }
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("ParseSize(%q) = %d, want %d", tt.input, got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

When NOT to Use

Don't use this when:

You have 1–2 test cases with significantly different setup logic — a table adds indirection for no gain
Each case requires unique assertions or error-checking logic that can't be unified
The test is inherently sequential (step 2 depends on step 1's output)

Over-application example:

func TestMigration(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name string
        // ... 15 fields for setup, teardown, assertions, side effects
    }{
        {"migrate v1 to v2", /* massive struct literal */},
        {"migrate v2 to v3", /* completely different struct literal */},
    }
    for _, tt := range tests {
        // 50 lines of conditional logic because each case is fundamentally different
    }
}

Better alternative:

func TestMigrateV1ToV2(t *testing.T) {
    // Clear, self-contained, readable
    db := setupV1(t)
    err := MigrateToV2(db)
    // specific assertions for this migration
}

func TestMigrateV2ToV3(t *testing.T) {
    db := setupV2(t)
    err := MigrateToV3(db)
    // different assertions entirely
}

Why: Table-driven tests shine when cases share identical setup/assertion logic and differ only in inputs and expected outputs. When each "case" needs its own control flow, the table becomes a mini-DSL that's harder to read than separate functions.

Anti-pattern: Writing individual assertions for each case, or copy-pasting test functions that differ by one input.

Code example (stdlib):

var headerWriteTests = []struct {
	h        Header
	exclude  map[string]bool
	expected string
}{
	{Header{}, nil, ""},
	{
		Header{
			"Content-Type":   {"text/html; charset=UTF-8"},
			"Content-Length": {"0"},
		},
		nil,
		"Content-Length: 0\r\nContent-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r\n",
	},
	// ... more cases
}

func TestHeaderWrite(t *testing.T) {
	var buf strings.Builder
	for i, test := range headerWriteTests {
		test.h.WriteSubset(&buf, test.exclude)
		if buf.String() != test.expected {
			t.Errorf("#%d:\n got: %q\nwant: %q", i, buf.String(), test.expected)
		}
		buf.Reset()
	}
}

Pattern Name: Named Table Tests with t.Run (Subtests)

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/encoding/json/encode_test.go lines 285-320, /tmp/go-src/src/encoding/json/scanner_test.go lines 30-50

What they do: Combine table-driven tests with t.Run for named subtests. Use a CaseName struct that captures file/line for error reporting.

Why: Each case gets its own subtest name — visible in go test -v, filterable with -run, and individually re-runnable. The CaseName/Where pattern provides precise file:line for failures even in large test tables.

Anti-pattern: Using index-only identification (hard to find which case failed), or creating separate TestFoo_Case1, TestFoo_Case2 functions.

Code example (stdlib):

func TestValid(t *testing.T) {
	tests := []struct {
		CaseName
		data string
		ok   bool
	}{
		{Name(""), `foo`, false},
		{Name(""), `}{`, false},
		{Name(""), `{}`, true},
		{Name("StringDoubleEscapes"), `{"foo":"bar"}`, true},
	}
	for _, tt := range tests {
		t.Run(tt.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
			if ok := Valid([]byte(tt.data)); ok != tt.ok {
				t.Errorf("%s: Valid(`%s`) = %v, want %v", tt.Where, tt.data, ok, tt.ok)
			}
		})
	}
}

Pattern Name: CaseName with Caller Position Tracking

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/encoding/json/internal/jsontest/testcase.go lines 18-37

What they do: Create a helper type that captures the caller's file:line at the point of test case declaration, so error messages point back to the exact test case definition.

Why: In a 1000-entry test table, t.Errorf points to the assertion line (same for all cases). CaseName makes failures point to the case definition.

Code example (stdlib):

type CaseName struct {
	Name  string
	Where CasePos
}

func Name(s string) (c CaseName) {
	c.Name = s
	runtime.Callers(2, c.Where.pc[:])
	return c
}

type CasePos struct{ pc [1]uintptr }

func (pos CasePos) String() string {
	frames := runtime.CallersFrames(pos.pc[:])
	frame, _ := frames.Next()
	return fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", path.Base(frame.File), frame.Line)
}

2. Test Helper Patterns

Pattern Name: t.Helper() for Clean Stack Traces

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/testing/testing.go lines 1415-1435

What they do: Call t.Helper() as the first line in any test utility function. This marks the function as a helper, so test failure messages report the caller's line instead of the helper's line.

Why: Without t.Helper(), every failure in a helper function points to the helper itself, not the test case that triggered the failure. Makes debugging test failures require reading the full stack.

Anti-pattern: Writing test utilities that call t.Fatal/t.Error without marking themselves as helpers.

Code example (stdlib):

// From net/http/clientserver_test.go lines 100-131
func run[T TBRun[T]](t T, f func(t T, mode testMode), opts ...any) {
	t.Helper()
	modes := []testMode{http1Mode, http2Mode, http3Mode}
	parallel := true
	for _, opt := range opts {
		switch opt := opt.(type) {
		case []testMode:
			modes = opt
		case testNotParallelOpt:
			parallel = false
		default:
			t.Fatalf("unknown option type %T", opt)
		}
	}
	// ...
	for _, mode := range modes {
		t.Run(string(mode), func(t T) {
			t.Helper()
			// ...
			f(t, mode)
		})
	}
}

Pattern Name: *testing.T as First Argument to Helpers

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/serve_test.go lines 4555-4580

What they do: Pass *testing.T (or testing.TB) as the first argument to test helper functions, making the dependency on the test context explicit.

Why: The test object provides Fatal, Error, Log, Helper, Cleanup — everything a helper needs for reporting. Accepting it as a parameter (rather than capturing it in a closure) makes helpers reusable across tests.

Code example (stdlib):

mustGet := func(url string, headers ...string) {
	t.Helper()
	req, err := NewRequest("GET", url, nil)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}
	for len(headers) > 0 {
		req.Header.Add(headers[0], headers[1])
		headers = headers[2:]
	}
	res, err := c.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Error fetching %s: %v", url, err)
		return
	}
	_, err = io.ReadAll(res.Body)
	defer res.Body.Close()
}

3. t.Cleanup vs defer

Pattern Name: t.Cleanup for Test-Scoped Resources

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/testing/testing.go lines 1439-1468, /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/clientserver_test.go lines 120-127

What they do: Use t.Cleanup(fn) instead of defer for resource cleanup in tests.

Why:

defer runs at the end of the function, not the test. In subtests launched with t.Run, a defer in a helper function runs when the helper returns — not when the subtest completes.
t.Cleanup runs after the test AND all its subtests finish — guaranteeing resources are available for the full test lifetime.
t.Cleanup is called in reverse order (LIFO), matching defer semantics but scoped to the test.

Anti-pattern: Using defer for cleanup in test setup functions that return before the test finishes, or in subtests where timing matters.

Code example (stdlib):

// From net/http/clientserver_test.go
func run[T TBRun[T]](t T, f func(t T, mode testMode), opts ...any) {
	// ...
	for _, mode := range modes {
		t.Run(string(mode), func(t T) {
			t.Cleanup(func() {
				afterTest(t)  // Goroutine leak detection — runs AFTER subtest body completes
			})
			f(t, mode)
		})
	}
}

4. testdata/ Directory Pattern

Pattern Name: testdata/ for Test Fixtures

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/testdata/ (contains file, index.html, style.css), /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/fs_test.go line 38

What they do: Store test fixtures in a testdata/ directory adjacent to the test files. Reference them with relative paths like "testdata/file".

Why:

go build ignores testdata/ directories — they never end up in production binaries.
go test runs with the package directory as CWD — relative paths to testdata/ work reliably.
Fixtures are version-controlled alongside the code they test.
Separates test data from test logic.

Anti-pattern: Embedding large test fixtures as string literals in test files, or referencing absolute paths.

Code example (stdlib):

// From net/http/fs_test.go line 38
const testFile = "testdata/file"

// Usage in test:
ServeFile(w, r, "testdata/file")

5. Golden File Testing

Pattern Name: Golden Files with -update Flag

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/cmd/gofmt/gofmt_test.go lines 18, 113-138

What they do: Compare test output against .golden files. Provide a -update flag that regenerates golden files from current output when behavior intentionally changes.

Why:

Tests complex output (formatted code, generated HTML, serialized data) without embedding it in test code.
The -update flag makes intentional changes easy: run go test -update, review the diff, commit.
Golden files serve as documentation of expected behavior.
Reviewers can see exactly what output changed in diffs.

When to Use

Triggers:

Your function produces complex multi-line output (formatted code, HTML, JSON, error messages)
Expected output would be 20+ lines if inlined in the test — unreadable
Output changes intentionally sometimes and you need a quick way to approve the new version

Example — before:

func TestRenderTemplate(t *testing.T) {
    got := renderHTML(data)
    want := `<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>Hello</title></head>
<body>
<h1>Welcome, Alice</h1>
<p>You have 3 messages.</p>
</body>
</html>` // 8 lines inline — and this is a SIMPLE template
    if got != want { t.Errorf("mismatch") }
}

Example — after:

var update = flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files")

func TestRenderTemplate(t *testing.T) {
    got := renderHTML(data)
    golden := filepath.Join("testdata", t.Name()+".golden")
    if *update {
        os.WriteFile(golden, []byte(got), 0644)
        return
    }
    want, _ := os.ReadFile(golden)
    if got != string(want) {
        t.Errorf("output mismatch; run with -update to accept new output")
    }
}
// Golden file lives at testdata/TestRenderTemplate.golden

When NOT to Use

Don't use this when:

Expected output is short (< 5 lines) — inline it directly for readability
Output is non-deterministic (timestamps, random IDs, goroutine ordering) without normalization
The golden file would need updating on every minor refactor — brittle and noisy diffs

Over-application example:

// Golden file for a one-line output
var update = flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files")

func TestVersion(t *testing.T) {
    got := Version()
    golden := "testdata/TestVersion.golden"
    if *update {
        os.WriteFile(golden, []byte(got), 0644)
        return
    }
    want, _ := os.ReadFile(golden)
    if got != string(want) {
        t.Error("mismatch")
    }
}
// testdata/TestVersion.golden contains: "v1.2.3"  — seriously?

Better alternative:

func TestVersion(t *testing.T) {
    got := Version()
    if got != "v1.2.3" {
        t.Errorf("Version() = %q, want %q", got, "v1.2.3")
    }
}

Why: Golden files add process overhead (the -update workflow, reviewing diffs in a separate file). For short, stable outputs, inline comparison is simpler, faster to read, and keeps the expected value next to the assertion.

Anti-pattern: Comparing against inline expected strings that span 50+ lines, or manually constructing expected output.

Code example (stdlib):

var update = flag.Bool("update", false, "update .golden files")

func runTest(t *testing.T, in, out string) {
	// ... produce actual output ...

	expected, err := os.ReadFile(out)
	if err != nil {
		t.Error(err)
		return
	}

	if got := buf.Bytes(); !bytes.Equal(got, expected) {
		if *update {
			if in != out {
				if err := os.WriteFile(out, got, 0666); err != nil {
					t.Error(err)
				}
				return
			}
		}
		t.Errorf("(gofmt %s) != %s\n%s", in, out,
			diff.Diff("expected", expected, "got", got))
	}
}

func TestRewrite(t *testing.T) {
	match, _ := filepath.Glob("testdata/*.input")
	for _, in := range match {
		name := filepath.Base(in)
		t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
			out := in[:len(in)-len(".input")] + ".golden"
			runTest(t, in, out)
		})
	}
}

6. httptest Patterns

Pattern Name: httptest.NewRecorder for Unit-Testing Handlers

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/serve_test.go lines 387-393

What they do: Use httptest.NewRecorder() to test HTTP handlers without starting a server. Captures status code, headers, and body.

Why: Fast, no network, no port allocation, no goroutines. Perfect for unit testing individual handlers in isolation.

When to Use

Triggers:

You're testing HTTP handler logic (status codes, headers, response body) in isolation
You don't need real TCP connections, TLS, or routing
Your test should run in <1ms, not wait for port binding

Example — before:

func TestHealthHandler(t *testing.T) {
    srv := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(healthHandler))
    defer srv.Close()
    resp, _ := http.Get(srv.URL + "/health") // real TCP connection — slow
    if resp.StatusCode != 200 { t.Fatal("not healthy") }
}

Example — after:

func TestHealthHandler(t *testing.T) {
    req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/health", nil)
    rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
    healthHandler(rec, req) // direct call — no network
    if rec.Code != 200 {
        t.Fatalf("got status %d, want 200", rec.Code)
    }
    if rec.Body.String() != "ok" {
        t.Errorf("body = %q, want %q", rec.Body.String(), "ok")
    }
}

When NOT to Use

Don't use this when:

You need to test real HTTP behavior: TLS handshakes, connection pooling, timeouts, keep-alive
Your handler depends on server-level middleware (e.g., http.Server.ConnContext, TLS client certs)
You're testing client behavior or redirect-following (need a real URL to connect to)

Over-application example:

func TestClientRetries(t *testing.T) {
    rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
    // Can't test retry logic — there's no real server for the client to connect to!
    // rec doesn't have a URL, no TCP, no connection reset simulation
}

Better alternative:

func TestClientRetries(t *testing.T) {
    attempts := 0
    srv := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        attempts++
        if attempts < 3 {
            w.WriteHeader(503)
            return
        }
        w.WriteHeader(200)
    }))
    defer srv.Close()
    // Now test the client's retry behavior against a real server
    resp, err := myClient.Get(srv.URL + "/resource")
    // ...
}

Why: httptest.NewRecorder tests handler logic in isolation — it has no network, no URL, no connection lifecycle. When you need to test anything that crosses the network boundary (clients, retries, TLS, timeouts), you need httptest.NewServer.

Anti-pattern: Spinning up a full server to test handler logic that doesn't need networking.

Code example (stdlib):

func TestServeMuxHandler(t *testing.T) {
	mux := NewServeMux()
	for _, e := range serveMuxRegister {
		mux.Handle(e.pattern, e.h)
	}
	for _, tt := range serveMuxTests {
		r := &Request{Method: tt.method, Host: tt.host, URL: &url.URL{Path: tt.path}}
		h, pattern := mux.Handler(r)
		rr := httptest.NewRecorder()
		h.ServeHTTP(rr, r)
		if pattern != tt.pattern || rr.Code != tt.code {
			t.Errorf("%s %s %s = %d, %q, want %d, %q",
				tt.method, tt.host, tt.path, rr.Code, pattern, tt.code, tt.pattern)
		}
	}
}

Pattern Name: httptest.NewServer for Integration-Style Tests

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/clientserver_test.go lines 203-280

What they do: Use httptest.NewServer / httptest.NewUnstartedServer for end-to-end HTTP testing with a real TCP listener on localhost.

Why: Tests the full HTTP stack including transport, TLS, connection pooling, timeouts. The clientServerTest helper in the stdlib runs each test across HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 modes.

Code example (stdlib):

func newClientServerTest(t testing.TB, mode testMode, h Handler, opts ...any) *clientServerTest {
	cst := &clientServerTest{t: t, h2: mode == http2Mode, h: h}
	cst.ts = httptest.NewUnstartedServer(h)
	// ... configure based on mode ...
	switch mode {
	case http1Mode:
		cst.ts.Start()
	case http2Mode:
		cst.ts.EnableHTTP2 = true
		cst.ts.StartTLS()
	}
	cst.c = cst.ts.Client()
	t.Cleanup(cst.close)
	return cst
}

7. Benchmark Patterns

Pattern Name: b.ReportAllocs + b.RunParallel + b.SetBytes

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/encoding/json/bench_test.go lines 85-101

What they do: Combine b.ReportAllocs() for allocation reporting, b.RunParallel for concurrent benchmarks, and b.SetBytes for throughput metrics.

Why:

b.ReportAllocs() shows allocations/op — critical for hot paths.
b.RunParallel measures performance under contention (real-world server behavior).
b.SetBytes converts to MB/s throughput — meaningful for serialization benchmarks.

Anti-pattern: Benchmarks that only measure wall time without allocation tracking, or sequential benchmarks for concurrent code.

Code example (stdlib):

func BenchmarkCodeEncoder(b *testing.B) {
	b.ReportAllocs()
	if codeJSON == nil {
		b.StopTimer()
		codeInit()
		b.StartTimer()
	}
	b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {
		enc := NewEncoder(io.Discard)
		for pb.Next() {
			if err := enc.Encode(&codeStruct); err != nil {
				b.Fatalf("Encode error: %v", err)
			}
		}
	})
	b.SetBytes(int64(len(codeJSON)))
}

8. Integration Test Separation

Pattern Name: testing.Short() for Expensive Tests

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/serve_test.go lines 800, 1000, 2212, 2581

What they do: Skip slow/flaky/network-dependent tests with testing.Short(). The Go CI runs with -short in fast mode, full tests in thorough mode.

Why: Fast feedback loop for development (go test -short), full validation in CI. No custom build tags needed.

Anti-pattern: Separate _integration_test.go files with build tags (Go stdlib doesn't do this), or always-slow tests that can't be skipped.

Code example (stdlib):

func TestServerTimeouts(t *testing.T) {
	if testing.Short() {
		t.Skip("skipping in short mode")
	}
	// ... expensive test with real timeouts ...
}

9. No Assertion Libraries in Stdlib

Pattern Name: Plain if/t.Errorf Over Assertion Frameworks

Source: Every test file in /tmp/go-src/src/ (zero imports of testify, gomega, or any assertion library)

What they do: Use plain Go: if got != want { t.Errorf(...) }. Never import assertion libraries.

Why:

No implicit control flow — t.Errorf continues execution, so you see ALL failures at once.
No magic — the test reads like regular Go code.
Error messages are custom-crafted for each assertion, providing context that generic assert.Equal cannot.
One less dependency.

Anti-pattern (Kubernetes uses this, stdlib does NOT):

// Kubernetes style (not stdlib):
assert.Equal(t, expected, actual)
require.NoError(t, err)

Stdlib style:

if got := v.Elem().Interface(); !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.out) {
	t.Fatalf("%s: Decode:\n\tgot:  %#v\n\twant: %#v", tt.Where, got, tt.out)
}

10. Goroutine Leak Detection

Pattern Name: TestMain + afterTest Goroutine Checking

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/main_test.go (entire file)

What they do: TestMain runs the test suite and checks for leaked goroutines after all tests complete. afterTest checks for goroutine leaks after each individual test.

Why: HTTP code spawns goroutines for connections, background reads, etc. Leaked goroutines indicate resource leaks (connections not closed, servers not shut down). Catching them prevents production OOMs.

Code example (stdlib):

func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
	v := m.Run()
	if v == 0 && goroutineLeaked() {
		os.Exit(1)
	}
	os.Exit(v)
}

func goroutineLeaked() bool {
	for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
		gs := interestingGoroutines()
		if len(gs) == 0 {
			return false
		}
		time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
	}
	// Report leaked goroutines
	return true
}

func afterTest(t testing.TB) {
	http.DefaultTransport.(*http.Transport).CloseIdleConnections()
	// Check for leaked goroutines from this specific test...
}

11. export_test.go Pattern

Pattern Name: Bridge File for Internal Testing

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/export_test.go lines 1-50

What they do: Create an export_test.go file in the package itself (package http, not http_test) that exports internal symbols to external test packages. Only compiled during testing.

Why: Allows http_test (external test package) to access internals needed for white-box testing without polluting the public API. The _test.go suffix means it's never included in production builds.

Code example (stdlib):

// export_test.go — package http (not http_test!)
package http

var (
	DefaultUserAgent             = defaultUserAgent
	ExportRefererForURL          = refererForURL
	ExportServerNewConn          = (*Server).newConn
	ExportErrRequestCanceled     = errRequestCanceled
)

12. Multi-Mode Test Runner

Pattern Name: Generic Test Runner Across Protocol Modes

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/clientserver_test.go lines 100-134

What they do: A generic run[T] function that executes every client/server test in HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 modes automatically. Tests opt into specific modes via options.

Why: Ensures behavioral consistency across protocol versions. A single test function covers all modes — no duplication. Bugs in one protocol version are caught immediately.

Code example (stdlib):

// Test declaration (one line runs across 3 protocols):
func TestServerTimeouts(t *testing.T) { run(t, testServerTimeouts, []testMode{http1Mode}) }

// The runner:
func run[T TBRun[T]](t T, f func(t T, mode testMode), opts ...any) {
	t.Helper()
	modes := []testMode{http1Mode, http2Mode, http3Mode}
	for _, mode := range modes {
		t.Run(string(mode), func(t T) {
			t.Helper()
			t.Cleanup(func() { afterTest(t) })
			f(t, mode)
		})
	}
}

13. testLogWriter — Routing Server Logs to Test Output

Pattern Name: io.Writer Adapter for *testing.T

Source: /tmp/go-src/src/net/http/clientserver_test.go lines 337-345

What they do: Implement io.Writer backed by t.Logf, so server error logs appear in test output (visible with -v, suppressed otherwise).

Why: Server logs are crucial for debugging test failures but shouldn't clutter passing output. t.Log gives you both: silent on pass, verbose on fail.

Code example (stdlib):

type testLogWriter struct {
	t testing.TB
}

func (w testLogWriter) Write(b []byte) (int, error) {
	w.t.Logf("server log: %v", strings.TrimSpace(string(b)))
	return len(b), nil
}

// Usage:
cst.ts.Config.ErrorLog = log.New(testLogWriter{t}, "", 0)

25 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape

Advanced Go Testing Patterns

1. Table-Driven Tests

Pattern Name: Anonymous Struct Test Table

When NOT to Use

Pattern Name: Named Table Tests with t.Run (Subtests)

Pattern Name: CaseName with Caller Position Tracking

2. Test Helper Patterns

Pattern Name: t.Helper() for Clean Stack Traces

Pattern Name: *testing.T as First Argument to Helpers

3. t.Cleanup vs defer

Pattern Name: t.Cleanup for Test-Scoped Resources

4. testdata/ Directory Pattern

Pattern Name: testdata/ for Test Fixtures

5. Golden File Testing

Pattern Name: Golden Files with -update Flag

When NOT to Use

6. httptest Patterns

Pattern Name: httptest.NewRecorder for Unit-Testing Handlers

When NOT to Use

Pattern Name: httptest.NewServer for Integration-Style Tests

7. Benchmark Patterns

Pattern Name: b.ReportAllocs + b.RunParallel + b.SetBytes

8. Integration Test Separation

Pattern Name: testing.Short() for Expensive Tests

9. No Assertion Libraries in Stdlib

Pattern Name: Plain if/t.Errorf Over Assertion Frameworks

10. Goroutine Leak Detection

Pattern Name: TestMain + afterTest Goroutine Checking

11. export_test.go Pattern

Pattern Name: Bridge File for Internal Testing

12. Multi-Mode Test Runner

Pattern Name: Generic Test Runner Across Protocol Modes

13. testLogWriter — Routing Server Logs to Test Output

Pattern Name: io.Writer Adapter for *testing.T

25 KiB

Raw Blame History