docs: add patterns extracted from ecto and oban

Ecto: 6 patterns (protocol dispatch, changeset separation, Multi pipelines)
Oban: 9 patterns (plugin behaviour, telemetry spans, engine abstraction)
This commit is contained in:
Rodin
2026-04-30 09:03:17 -07:00
parent 9a94765ea2
commit 44c61840df
2 changed files with 901 additions and 0 deletions
+359
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
# Patterns Extracted from oban-bg/oban
## Pattern: Plugin as Behaviour + GenServer
**Source:** `lib/oban/plugin.ex`
**Category:** plugin
**What:** Define a plugin interface as a behaviour with
`start_link/1` and `validate/1` callbacks. Plugins must be
OTP-compliant (GenServer/Agent). The host supervises them.
**Why:** Extensibility without coupling. Oban can start any
module that satisfies the behaviour — pruning, cron,
lifeline — without knowing implementation details. The
`validate/1` callback ensures misconfigured plugins fail at
startup, not at runtime.
**Example:**
```elixir
@callback start_link([option()]) :: GenServer.on_start()
@callback validate([option()]) :: :ok | {:error, String.t()}
@optional_callbacks [format_logger_output: 2]
```
**When to use:** When your application needs a plugin
system where third parties add behavior. The behaviour
ensures type safety; supervision ensures fault isolation.
**When NOT to use:** Internal modules that you control.
Behaviours add ceremony — if there is only one
implementation, use a module directly.
---
## Pattern: Structured Telemetry Spans
**Source:** `lib/oban/telemetry.ex`
**Category:** telemetry
**What:** Emit telemetry events as spans with
start/stop/exception structure. Every operation (job
execution, engine calls, plugin work) follows the same
three-event pattern with consistent metadata shapes.
**Why:** Uniform observability. Any monitoring tool
(AppSignal, Datadog, custom logger) can hook into the same
event structure. The span pattern (start → stop|exception)
enables latency tracking, error rates, and resource usage
measurement without custom instrumentation per feature.
**Example:**
```elixir
# Event names follow: [:oban, :component, :action, :phase]
[:oban, :job, :start]
[:oban, :job, :stop] # measurements: duration, memory
[:oban, :job, :exception] # + kind, reason, stacktrace
[:oban, :engine, :fetch_jobs, :start]
[:oban, :engine, :fetch_jobs, :stop]
[:oban, :engine, :fetch_jobs, :exception]
```
**When to use:** Any library or application that wants
observability without coupling to a specific monitoring
backend. The pattern works for database queries, HTTP
requests, background jobs, cache operations.
**When NOT to use:** Ultra-hot paths where telemetry
overhead matters (millions of events/second). Use sampling
or skip entirely.
---
## Pattern: Engine Abstraction for Backend Swap
**Source:** `lib/oban/engine.ex`
**Category:** engine
**What:** Define a behaviour (`Engine`) with callbacks for
all database operations (insert, fetch, complete, etc.).
Ship multiple implementations (Basic/Inline/Lite) that swap
at config time.
**Why:** Different environments need different backends:
Postgres for production, SQLite for development, inline
(in-memory) for testing. The engine abstraction lets you
swap without changing application code.
**Example:**
```elixir
@callback init(conf, opts) :: {:ok, meta} | {:error, term}
@callback insert_job(conf, changeset, opts) :: {:ok, Job.t()}
@callback fetch_jobs(conf, meta, opts) :: {:ok, {meta, [Job.t()]}}
@callback complete_job(conf, Job.t()) :: :ok
```
**When to use:** When your system needs to support multiple
storage backends, or when testing requires a fundamentally
different execution model (synchronous vs async).
**When NOT to use:** Single-backend applications. The
abstraction layer adds complexity that is only justified
when you actually swap implementations.
---
## Pattern: Keyword Validation with Reduce-While
**Source:** `lib/oban/validation.ex`
**Category:** config
**What:** Validate keyword options by iterating with
`Enum.reduce_while/3` and a validator function. Stop at
first error. Return `:ok` or `{:error, reason}`.
**Why:** Keyword lists are the standard Elixir config
format. Validating them procedurally (nested if/case) gets
messy. The reduce-while + validator pattern is composable:
each option validates independently, errors short-circuit,
and the validator function can be swapped or extended.
**Example:**
```elixir
def validate(opts, validator) when is_list(opts) do
Enum.reduce_while(opts, :ok, fn opt, acc ->
case validator.(opt) do
:ok -> {:cont, acc}
{:error, _} = error -> {:halt, error}
end
end)
end
```
**When to use:** Any public API that accepts keyword
options from users. Libraries, GenServer init, plugin
configs.
**When NOT to use:** Internal functions where the caller
is trusted. Also avoid for deeply nested configs — use
schema-based validation (NimbleOptions, Ecto embedded
schemas) instead.
---
## Pattern: Testing Mode Toggle
**Source:** `lib/oban/testing.ex`, `lib/oban/config.ex`
**Category:** testing
**What:** Support a `testing:` config option that switches
execution mode: `:disabled` (production), `:inline`
(execute immediately in caller process), `:manual` (enqueue
but don't execute — assert on DB state).
**Why:** Background job systems are inherently async, which
makes testing hard. The mode toggle gives you: (1) inline
for unit tests that need synchronous execution, (2) manual
for integration tests that verify enqueueing without
side effects.
**Example:**
```elixir
# In test config:
config :my_app, Oban, testing: :manual
# In tests:
use Oban.Testing, repo: MyApp.Repo
perform_job(MyWorker, %{id: 1})
assert_enqueued worker: MyWorker, args: %{id: 1}
```
**When to use:** Any async system that needs deterministic
testing — job queues, event buses, notification systems.
The testing mode replaces "sleep and hope" with explicit
control.
**When NOT to use:** Synchronous systems that are already
deterministic. Also avoid if the mode toggle leaks into
production code paths (keep it config-only, not conditional
logic scattered through business code).
---
## Pattern: Stopper for Goroutine Lifecycle (CockroachDB)
**Source:** `pkg/util/stop/stopper.go` (cockroachdb)
**Category:** concurrency
**What:** A dedicated struct that manages the lifecycle of
all goroutines in a component: tracks active tasks, refuses
new work during shutdown (quiesce), waits for completion,
then runs closers.
**Why:** In distributed systems, clean shutdown is critical.
You need to: (1) stop accepting new work, (2) finish
in-flight work, (3) release resources in order. The Stopper
centralizes this instead of scattering shutdown logic across
every goroutine.
**Example:**
```go
type Stopper struct {
quiescer chan struct{} // closed when quiescing
stopped chan struct{} // closed when fully stopped
mu struct {
syncutil.RWMutex
_numTasks int32
quiescing, stopping bool
closers []Closer
}
}
// RunAsyncTask refuses new work during quiesce
func (s *Stopper) RunAsyncTask(ctx context.Context,
taskName string, f func(context.Context)) error {
if !s.addTask() {
return ErrUnavailable
}
go func() {
defer s.decTask()
f(ctx)
}()
return nil
}
```
**When to use:** Any server or subsystem that spawns
goroutines and needs graceful shutdown. Especially in
long-running services where leaked goroutines cause
resource exhaustion.
**When NOT to use:** Simple programs with a single main
goroutine. Or when `errgroup` with context cancellation
suffices for the shutdown coordination.
---
## Pattern: Atomic File Operations with Suffix Convention
**Source:** `tsdb/db.go` (prometheus)
**Category:** storage
**What:** Use directory suffixes (`.tmp-for-creation`,
`.tmp-for-deletion`) to make multi-step file operations
crash-safe. On startup, clean up any dirs with these
suffixes (they represent incomplete operations).
**Why:** Database storage needs atomicity. If the process
crashes between creating a block and finalizing it, you
need to know the block is incomplete. The suffix convention
makes incomplete state visible at the filesystem level
without requiring a separate journal.
**Example:**
```go
const (
tmpForDeletionBlockDirSuffix = ".tmp-for-deletion"
tmpForCreationBlockDirSuffix = ".tmp-for-creation"
)
// On startup: remove any .tmp-* dirs (incomplete ops)
// On create: write to dir.tmp-for-creation, then rename
// On delete: rename to dir.tmp-for-deletion, then remove
```
**When to use:** Any system that manages files/directories
and needs crash consistency without a full WAL. Simpler
than a write-ahead log for coarse-grained operations.
**When NOT to use:** When you already have a WAL or
transaction log. Or for fine-grained operations where
rename semantics are insufficient.
---
## Pattern: Options as DefaultOptions() + Override
**Source:** `tsdb/db.go` (prometheus)
**Category:** configuration
**What:** Provide a `DefaultOptions()` function returning a
fully-populated config struct. Users copy and override only
what they need. No nil-means-default ambiguity.
**Why:** Large config structs (20+ fields) are unwieldy.
By providing sane defaults as a function (not a package-
level var), you avoid mutation bugs and make it clear what
"normal" looks like. Users only specify deviations.
**Example:**
```go
func DefaultOptions() *Options {
return &Options{
WALSegmentSize: wlog.DefaultSegmentSize,
RetentionDuration: int64(15 * 24 * time.Hour / ...),
MinBlockDuration: DefaultBlockDuration,
MaxBlockDuration: DefaultBlockDuration,
SamplesPerChunk: DefaultSamplesPerChunk,
// ... 20 more fields with sane defaults
}
}
// Usage:
opts := tsdb.DefaultOptions()
opts.RetentionDuration = 30 * 24 * time.Hour
db, err := tsdb.Open(dir, nil, nil, opts, nil)
```
**When to use:** Config structs with many fields where most
users want defaults. Especially when zero-value semantics
would be confusing (e.g., 0 retention = infinite? or off?).
**When NOT to use:** Small configs (3-4 fields) where
struct literal with zero-means-default is clear enough.
---
## Pattern: Scrape Loop with Aligned Timestamps
**Source:** `scrape/scrape.go` (prometheus)
**Category:** concurrency
**What:** Periodic scrape loops that align timestamps to
intervals with a small tolerance, enabling better storage
compression downstream.
**Why:** Time-series databases compress better when
timestamps are regular. A 2ms tolerance on alignment
means scraped data aligns to the expected grid while
accommodating real-world jitter.
**Example:**
```go
var ScrapeTimestampTolerance = 2 * time.Millisecond
var AlignScrapeTimestamps = true
// In scrape loop: if scrape finishes within tolerance
// of the expected timestamp, snap to the grid
```
**When to use:** Any periodic data collection where
downstream storage benefits from timestamp regularity.
Metrics, heartbeats, polling loops.
**When NOT to use:** Event-driven data where timestamps
must reflect actual occurrence time. Audit logs, user
actions, financial transactions.
<!-- PATTERN_COMPLETE -->